-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GCS ACLE #364
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
GCS ACLE #364
Conversation
The only difference compared to #260 is use of non-const type for GCS pointer (an relevant change in wording). |
main/design_documents/gcs.md
Outdated
at compile time if (1) is true which can be feature tested. With (C) | ||
there is no obvious feature test for the presence of the intrinsics. | ||
|
||
The future direction is to make intrinsics available unconditionally |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is how other intrinsics are defined already in practice (gcc, clang at least)
Macro just there to indicate to the user the availability of the intrinsics.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for clarification. I've changed the wording, let me know if it's better now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 from me, just a note from me.
let see what others says.
Co-authored-by: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>
70ac9c6
to
a6e18dd
Compare
Co-authored-by: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>
This is to continue discussion started in #260.
name: Pull request
about: Technical issues, document format problems, bugs in scripts or feature proposal.