Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vendor logo con/image #36

Open
mzamaron opened this issue Jan 17, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Vendor logo con/image #36

mzamaron opened this issue Jan 17, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@mzamaron
Copy link

I would need to be able to specify the path to the file where we can found an icon. The goal is to be able to display it as a logo into a tool which manage CMSIS-Pack.�
Is it possible to add an element into the pdsc scheme to describe the file into the pack for this logo.
logo

@jkrech
Copy link
Contributor

jkrech commented Jan 18, 2017

Thanks a lot for this suggestion. I would like to get this feature specified in a bit more detail.
What is the scope for this Logo?
a) for the pack as a whole ?
b) for individual components (Cvendor) as well ?

Shall we anticipate more than one logo per pack ?

What is the file format and dimensions/size/resolution we shall specify ?

Do you expect the use of the logo to be granted by the vendor implicitly ?
I guess we should use the "public" attribute to ensure vendors give permission and understand the implications

Any feedback from anyone on this ?

@mzamaron
Copy link
Author

What is the scope for this Logo?
As shown, on the picture the scope is to easily identify the vendor using his logo.
The scope is also to avoid the usage of non-public logo (i.e. restricted image)
a) for the pack as a whole ?
Only for the pack, as the pack is identify by the vendor
b) for individual components (Cvendor) as well ?
no necessary
Shall we anticipate more than one logo per pack ?
perhaps we can add a logo for Class definition, but it's not necessary
What is the file format and dimensions/size/resolution we shall specify ?
Can we take the same definition as the image for the board
/package/boards/board/image
Do you expect the use of the logo to be granted by the vendor implicitly ?
I guess we should use the "public" attribute to ensure vendors give permission and understand the implications
Yes, it's a good idea.
Michel

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants