Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix compile error on ./prj_editor/src/toolchains_editor.adb #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2017

Conversation

qunying
Copy link
Contributor

@qunying qunying commented Jan 4, 2017

On line 958, Tool'Image will give compile error, as 'Image is expecting a type, not an object instance, it should change to either Tool'Img.

On line 958,  `Tool'Image` will give compile error, as `'Image` is expecting a type, not an object instance, it should change to either `Tool'Img`.
@AnthonyLeonardoGracio
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the fix! Your patch has been submitted in the development branch.

We dit not notice the issue with the compiler we use (which must be different from yours).

@qunying
Copy link
Contributor Author

qunying commented Jan 4, 2017

I am using FSF GCC 6.3.0 for the compilation.

@setton setton merged commit 6f36e0e into AdaCore:master Jan 7, 2017
adacore-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2020
The show-representation plugin now pretty-prints conditional expressions, so
that instead of:

   for Foo.Baz'Value_Size use
     ((#1 != 0) ?<> ((#1 != 1) ?<> ((#1 == 2)
     ?<> 160 ?<> 40) ?<> 128) ?<> 96);

we are now showing:

   for Baz'Value_Size use
     (if (#1 != 0) then (if (#1 != 1) then (if (#1 == 2)
     then 160 else 40 end) else 128 end) else 96 end);

exactly like in the textual output with -gnatR3 switch.

no-precommit-check) still using python2 (reference to 'long')

Change-Id: I943cb62d3b7a5874d41070904c2eb0bf122d8550
adacore-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants