You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I need to create lot of dummy views (it only has templateName) to customize the table cell markup. It would be great, if the Ember.Table.TableCell's templateName is computed from column definition
@ppong Yes, i can specify the tableCellViewClass as a string which should be a view name like App.MyCellView, but with this i will end up with too many Ember.View classes in my App namespace. In my case all those View classes will have only templateName.
Yes, even i can specify the tableCellViewClass as a Ember.View class, but is that correct way (It is something like mixing View related stuff in Controller)?. Correct me if i am wrong with this.
Gaurav0
pushed a commit
to Gaurav0/ember-table
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2015
The `tbody` class does not have 100% height. That's why it's not extended to full table height at the initial rendering. This is the root cause of html-next/vertical-collection#127
The fix is to set the class to 100% height.
I need to create lot of dummy views (it only has templateName) to customize the table cell markup. It would be great, if the Ember.Table.TableCell's templateName is computed from column definition
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: