Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Performance Powersave toggler. #467

Closed
niksingh710 opened this issue Jan 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

[Feature] Performance Powersave toggler. #467

niksingh710 opened this issue Jan 3, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@niksingh710
Copy link

The tools are working fine.
Just have one request it should have a cli way of interaction to switch the governor.

e.g
currently, my config states that on charging the governor should be performance and when not on AC it should be powersave

This ramps up my fan while charging.
sometimes I want it to be on powersave even when it is charging to keep my fan silent. and for that I have to change the config and reload auto-cpufreq

I want the feature to be something like

auto-cpufreq --force governer powersave    # This should keep the governer to powersave mode no matter what the state is.
auto-cpufreq --force governer performance # This should keep the governer to performance mode no matter what the state is (AC or on Battery)
auto-cpufreq --force reset # resets to the config state.
auto-cpufreq --state # (should return powersave,performance,reseted) So that the user can create a indicator in it's bar config.
@AdnanHodzic
Copy link
Owner

AdnanHodzic commented Jan 3, 2023

This is already possible with auto-cpufreq config file.

It would be great to have this functionality, especially if we had a gnome extension, as I proposed here.

Since I'm very limited with available time to do this myself. If you want to give it a try in implementing this functionality, please give it a try and contribute to the project and you will be credited for your work as part of future release.

@AdnanHodzic
Copy link
Owner

Changes made by @shadeyg56 as part of #476 are now merged with master branch, hence closing this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants