Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement KIP-893 nullable entity fields #101

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

aiven-anton
Copy link
Collaborator

This commit implements support for the nullable entity field introduced in ConsumerGroupHeartbeatResponse.assignment. This kind of field was formalized upstream in KIP-893 but is not mentioned in any official documentation of the protocol.

The KIP also mentions tagged fields. I left this out as I don't understand why another mechanism for omiting a tagged field value is needed, and AFAIK no entity uses this yet.

Partially addresses #100.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 21, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (657d4ec) 96.31% compared to head (412e6c6) 96.69%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #101      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.31%   96.69%   +0.37%     
==========================================
  Files          13       14       +1     
  Lines         951      997      +46     
  Branches      132      141       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits          916      964      +48     
+ Misses         30       29       -1     
+ Partials        5        4       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aiven-anton aiven-anton force-pushed the aiven-anton/fix-nullable-entity-field branch from 0fc4ec6 to 94e1949 Compare November 21, 2023 20:26
This commit implements support for the nullable entity field introduced
in `ConsumerGroupHeartbeatResponse.assignment`. This kind of field was
formalized upstream in KIP-893 but is not mentioned in any official
documentation of the protocol.

The KIP also mentions tagged fields. I left this out for now as I don't
understand why another mechanism for omitting a tagged field value is
needed, and AFAIK no entity uses this yet.
@aiven-anton aiven-anton force-pushed the aiven-anton/fix-nullable-entity-field branch from 94e1949 to 04455db Compare November 21, 2023 20:45
@aiven-anton aiven-anton marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2023 20:47
@aiven-anton aiven-anton requested a review from ivanyu November 21, 2023 20:47
@giuseppelillo giuseppelillo enabled auto-merge (squash) December 5, 2023 13:12
@giuseppelillo giuseppelillo merged commit 28e3ea5 into main Dec 5, 2023
12 checks passed
@giuseppelillo giuseppelillo deleted the aiven-anton/fix-nullable-entity-field branch December 5, 2023 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants