Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Experiments for Usability Evaluations #335

Closed
dvenprasad opened this issue Jun 18, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

Experiments for Usability Evaluations #335

dvenprasad opened this issue Jun 18, 2018 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@dvenprasad
Copy link
Member

Context

For usability evaluations, I need to set up a scenario and have the user perform different tasks in the context of the scenario. @jaclyn-taroni suggested a scenario where the user will have to search for the term "imatinib"

Problem or idea

We need to ensure that the search term "imatinib" will return at least 6-10 results.
These are the accessions returned by GEO,ArrayExpress, and SRA for the search term 'imatinib' which is also part of the list in #223

E-MEXP-433
E-MTAB-2594
E-TABM-585
E-TABM-702
GSE22852
GSE30416

Solution or next step

We will need to keep a tab on these accessions and make a note whether they are processed or not.

Also, the number of experiments is on the lower end of what I would like. Would it be possible to explore an alternate scenario?

@jaclyn-taroni jaclyn-taroni added this to the Marimba Miso milestone Jun 18, 2018
@jaclyn-taroni
Copy link
Member

This seems low and incomplete to me. For instance, I would expect GSE38310 to be in this list because it is on GPL6947 which we support: https://github.com/AlexsLemonade/refinebio/blob/dev/config/supported_microarray_platforms.csv#L596.

@dvenprasad can you determine if there might be an error on your end or upstream as part of this list #223 (comment) ?

@dvenprasad
Copy link
Member Author

Okay, that was my bad. They were listed in E-GEOD-XXXX format.
In addition to the accessions above, these are also part of the list in #222

E-GEOD-10912
E-GEOD-14671
E-GEOD-15237
E-GEOD-15892
E-GEOD-17480
E-GEOD-1922
E-GEOD-20876
E-GEOD-20987
E-GEOD-21315
E-GEOD-21664
E-GEOD-22433
E-GEOD-22852
E-GEOD-24813
E-GEOD-2535
E-GEOD-28698
E-GEOD-30883
E-GEOD-33075
E-GEOD-34900
E-GEOD-38310
E-GEOD-39335
E-GEOD-43225
E-GEOD-44810
E-GEOD-46928
E-GEOD-51698
E-GEOD-5258
E-GEOD-53202
E-GEOD-53633
E-GEOD-56472
E-GEOD-57800
E-GEOD-57805
E-GEOD-57811
E-GEOD-57815
E-GEOD-57822
E-GEOD-6338
E-GEOD-64762
E-GEOD-7114

@jaclyn-taroni
Copy link
Member

Is this updated list enough experiments for the evals?

@dvenprasad
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, this will be enough for testing.

@dvenprasad
Copy link
Member Author

@Miserlou @kurtwheeler @dongbohu These accessions should be part of the list of experiments we process first.

@jaclyn-taroni
Copy link
Member

Related: #54

@jaclyn-taroni
Copy link
Member

@kurtwheeler will run in staging

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants