You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed in #2412 the date_of_acquisition values recorded in LIMS do not agree with the start_time recorded in the stimulus pickle file. Because we want our dates of acquisition to agree across sessions and metadata tables, we are going to take date_of_acquisition form pickle_file_data['start_time'] to be maximally self-consistent. This means either
modifying the input.json files used to produce NWB files so that they get date_of_acquisition from the pickle file
modifying NWB generation so that it ignores the date_of_acquisition in the input.json and just reads whatever is in the pickle file.
If we go with (1), I think we should take on #2400, understanding that the LIMS querying methods implemented in #2407 should make that much easier.
Validation
When NWBs are generated, date_of_acquisition should agree with what is recorded in the stimulus pickle file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As discussed in #2412 the date_of_acquisition values recorded in LIMS do not agree with the start_time recorded in the stimulus pickle file. Because we want our dates of acquisition to agree across sessions and metadata tables, we are going to take date_of_acquisition form
pickle_file_data['start_time']
to be maximally self-consistent. This means eitherIf we go with (1), I think we should take on #2400, understanding that the LIMS querying methods implemented in #2407 should make that much easier.
Validation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: