-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pull request automation? #1167
Comments
@joelhulen, I really like @martincostello suggestion here. Would save us a lot of time. Can we try to go ahead with this? |
I'm game. What do I need to do? |
To do this, roughly these steps:
After those are set up I can do the pull requests based on the examples I linked to to use the bots to add the automation. Happy to do a quick call with you to walk through doing the steps of setting up the apps if that's easier. |
Joel and I did a quick call just now and got the bots and secrets set up and installed. Tomorrow I'll push up a PR adding the workflows and we can check we're happy with the implementation and that everything's set up correctly. |
To aid in the maintenance of Polly (dependabot updates, .NET SDK updates), it would be good to harness GitHub Actions and the GitHub API to perform some tasks automatically to reduce some of the human element.
The initial automation I'd like to add are:
To get the most out of this, the first three ideas for automation needs to run as a GitHub user or app (bot), rather than use
GITHUB_TOKEN
, which has limitations in terms of triggering actions (docs) - otherwise CI runs aren't queued-up.Assuming others are happy with these ideas, we'd just need a bot (or two; one to edit, one to approve) created in App-vNext (
pollybot
,polly-reviewer
? ideas for better names welcome) and a private key to exchange for an access token to act on the bot's behalf added to the GitHub Actions secrets in this repo.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: