You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Property types should be put into the foreground more for ConfigMe 2.0, with hopes that they can be reused for bean mappers and internally in the different property types. Part of that idea would be to try and see if we can have collection property types that can be combined with a base property type to e.g. express the type of Set<String>.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…perty builders
- Arrays, inline arrays and collections are now based on property types which can be constructed from other property paths
- Introduce an enum set type
- Refactor the property builders (remove inheritance among builders, rename methods for default values to be more clear)
- Lift requirement that the collections in properties are always unmodifiable; to be seen in more depth with #379
Property types should be put into the foreground more for ConfigMe 2.0, with hopes that they can be reused for bean mappers and internally in the different property types. Part of that idea would be to try and see if we can have collection property types that can be combined with a base property type to e.g. express the type of
Set<String>
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: