You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What problem would the enhancement address for VIP?
It would be useful if there was a way for clients to see a more granular report for checking VIP Go platform compatibility in regards to functionality requirements.
Describe the solution you'd like
Currently, we have a "Compatibility" folder, but there's only one sniff in it (that is to be deprecated). However, a lot of the sniffs live in the other categories since when they were first categorized, compatibility was seen as a secondary category. There are a few ways to go about it that I can see:
Option A) Maintain a separate ruleset aka WordPress-VIP-Compatibility (after #600 has completed).
Option B) For #600, move those sniffs into the Compatibility folder since we are breaking error codes anyways.
(interim) Option C) Have a paste-able command available for clients who want to run that type of check in our docs e.g.
What problem would the enhancement address for VIP?
It would be useful if there was a way for clients to see a more granular report for checking VIP Go platform compatibility in regards to functionality requirements.
Describe the solution you'd like
Currently, we have a "Compatibility" folder, but there's only one sniff in it (that is to be deprecated). However, a lot of the sniffs live in the other categories since when they were first categorized, compatibility was seen as a secondary category. There are a few ways to go about it that I can see:
Option A) Maintain a separate ruleset aka WordPress-VIP-Compatibility (after #600 has completed).
Option B) For #600, move those sniffs into the Compatibility folder since we are breaking error codes anyways.
(interim) Option C) Have a paste-able command available for clients who want to run that type of check in our docs e.g.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: