You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the main axis of classification is the type of resources (books, articles, ...)
It seems to me that the more the list grows and the more it becomes messy due to it.
I think what would be more interesting is a classification by thematic (shaders, collisions, etc...) because I guess it is how people are searching for a resource: "What interesting resources can I get on this specific topic?"
If anyone has a better idea on the structure, feel free to share your insights here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the main axis of classification is the type of resources (books, articles, ...)
It seems to me that the more the list grows and the more it becomes messy due to it.
I think what would be more interesting is a classification by thematic (shaders, collisions, etc...) because I guess it is how people are searching for a resource: "What interesting resources can I get on this specific topic?"
If anyone has a better idea on the structure, feel free to share your insights here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: