Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Build] Install k8s packages from sonic build storage to mitigate k8s source deprecation issue (#18280) #18307

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 202305
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lixiaoyuner
Copy link
Contributor

Why I did it
pkgs.k8s.io: Introducing Kubernetes Community-Owned Package Repositories | Kubernetes

For 1.22.2 k8s packages, source repo has been deprecated, going to store these packages in sonic build storage for installation to mitigate the issue. Will migrate to new repo when we are ready to upgrade k8s version.

Work item tracking
Microsoft ADO (number only): 27075924
How I did it
Store the 1.22.2 k8s package in sonic build storage and install the package there.

How to verify it
"apt list" to check if it's installed.

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

… source deprecation issue (sonic-net#18280)

Why I did it
pkgs.k8s.io: Introducing Kubernetes Community-Owned Package Repositories | Kubernetes

For 1.22.2 k8s packages, source repo has been deprecated, going to store these packages in sonic build storage for installation to mitigate the issue. Will migrate to new repo when we are ready to upgrade k8s version.

Work item tracking
Microsoft ADO (number only): 27075924
How I did it
Store the 1.22.2 k8s package in sonic build storage and install the package there.

How to verify it
"apt list" to check if it's installed.
@lixiaoyuner lixiaoyuner marked this pull request as ready for review March 8, 2024 09:17
@StormLiangMS
Copy link
Contributor

hi @lixiaoyuner is this a must have for 202305?

Copy link
Contributor

@StormLiangMS StormLiangMS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@StormLiangMS
Copy link
Contributor

hi @xumia could you help to take a look?

Copy link
Collaborator

@xumia xumia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants