Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PAC changes to receive config updates #18620

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

vijaya-ops
Copy link
Contributor

Why I did it

PAC changes to receive config updates

How I did it

How to verify it

@lguohan lguohan added the PAC Port Access Control Feature label May 19, 2024

// Configure port learning mode for FDB manager
fvVector.emplace_back("learn_mode", learning);
m_stateOperPortTable.set(key, fvVector);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This sets the value of the learning mode in the STATE_DB of PAC. Should we update this to the APPL_DB of port table also so that it is pushed down

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PAC doesn't interact directly with the Orch agent. The Orch agent updates are done using VLAN mgr. Hence PAC uses STATE_DB .

@vijaya-ops
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-buildimage

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@Praveen-Brcm Praveen-Brcm merged commit 3a167ad into sonic-net:master Oct 25, 2024
21 checks passed
rkavitha-hcl pushed a commit to rkavitha-hcl/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
aidan-gallagher pushed a commit to aidan-gallagher/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PAC Port Access Control Feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants