Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SONiC Workgroup details in table format #1593

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kannankvs
Copy link
Collaborator

As suggested, Have added one more column named “Workgroup Meeting” to cover the meeting info. Have also left the column empty for Workgroup meeting for leads to review and provide latest meeting info.

SONiC Workgroup details in table format
| Workgroups | Mailing List | Status | Workgroup Charter | Workgroup Meeting |
| -----------| ------------ | ------ | ----------------- | ----------------- |
| [Testing Workgroup](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sonic-test-workgroup) | sonic-test-workgroup@gmail.com | Active | 1. Testbed improvement. <br> 2. Pytest framework enhancement <br> 3. Pytest conversion from ansible test. <br> 4. Specific/new tests <br> 5. Visualized DUT with data plane capabilities <br> 6. One(AKA, Crystalnet) integration (open source) <br> For detailed SONiC test-workgroup charter click [here](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sonic-test-workgroup/OD_UhjqlZ9Y). | |
| [Management Workgroup](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sonic-mgmt-workgroup) | sonic-mgmt-workgroup@googlegroups.com | Active | 1. Simplify and Standardize SONiC management <br> 2. Make SONiC management DevOps friendly <br> 3. Industry standard CLI for SONiC config validations and error feedback | |
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The above workgroup is no longer active. The current active group is called UMF Workgroup, mailing alias umf-working-group@lists.sonicfoundation.dev

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@adyeung Are you referring to line no 6 - Management workgroup ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct, the comment is referring to management workgroup

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@adyeung Have updated the management group as inactive and added the UMF working group. Also updated the table for alphabetical order.

Updated umf working group
updated the meeting details
updated few more subgroup meeting details
@zhangyanzhao
Copy link
Collaborator

@lucyhyde can you please help to review the workgroup list? I think some workgroups created under LF are still missed. I will double check as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants