Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] Version 4.61.3 seems to bring about very significant increases in token endpoint and metadata request volumes #4855

Open
sgryt opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
confidential-client needs attention Delete label after triage untriaged Do not delete. Needed for Automation

Comments

@sgryt
Copy link

sgryt commented Jul 23, 2024

Library version used

4.61.3

.NET version

Various

Scenario

ConfidentialClient - web site (AcquireTokenByAuthCode)

Is this a new or an existing app?

The app is in production, and I have upgraded to a new version of MSAL

Issue description and reproduction steps

This report is being created on behalf of a number of customers of our service, all exhibiting the same change in traffic volume behavior towards our service.

On June 11/12, the request volume towards our service (which is an OpenID Provider) token and OIDC metadata endpoints increased dramatically overnight. Dialog with customers indicates that they bumped the Microsoft.Identity.Client library from version 4.60.3 to 4.61.3 at that time.

The increase in volume is about 3 orders of magnitude (1000x).

I don't have much more detail to reveal at the moment (we do not have access to the codebases of our customers, so I cannot inspect their specific setup/middleware configuration).

Please advise on how to proceed ? We would very much like to be able to guide our customers on how to reestablish the previous traffic patterns.

Relevant code snippets

No response

Expected behavior

A reasonable ratio between succesful authorize requests and subsequent token exchange requests.

Identity provider

Other

Regression

No response

Solution and workarounds

No response

@sgryt sgryt added needs attention Delete label after triage untriaged Do not delete. Needed for Automation labels Jul 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
confidential-client needs attention Delete label after triage untriaged Do not delete. Needed for Automation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants