Indenter and formatter do not agree on keyword in function position when regex indent rules are involved

[PEZ]

Given a cljfmt config such as:

{:indents {#"\S+" [[:inner 0]]}
 :test-form
 (comment
   (and a
     b)
   (:require []
             [])
   :rcf)}

The formatter will indent things like in the :test-form there. But the indenter will indent the (:require ...) form using the [[:inner 0]] rule:

   (:require []|
             [])

enter

   (:require []
     |
             [])

tab

   (:require []
             |
             [])

I don't know if cljfmt is in the wrong here, so maybe we should ask/check over there before deciding how to deal with this.

cc: @SillyCoon (I tried the repro with v2.0.322 of Calva and it is the same there, so not an obvious regression from your recent work with this code.)

[PEZ]

I've asked about it now:

• Should regular expressions in indent rules be able to target keywords? weavejester/cljfmt#298