[WIP] Move Clojure Warrior into Calva

[PEZ]

This is just started.

When it's done it will have Introduced the following change(s):

• Moved Clojure Warrior source code into Calva
• Made Calva contribute what CW previously contributed (settings, commands, etcetera)
• Made Calva activate the CW features such as rainbows and comment dimming/highlighting

I have:

• Read How to Contribute.
• Made sure I am directing this pull request at the dev branch. (Or have specific reasons to target some other branch.)
• Made sure I am changed the default PR base branch, so that it is not master. (Sorry for the nagging.)
• Updated the README.md
• Updated the [Unreleased] entry in CHANGELOG.md, linking the issue(s) that the PR is addressing.

Ping: @cfehse , @kstehn

[PEZ]

This is ready for merge afaict, @kstehn and @cfehse . What do you say?

[cfehse]

@PEZ I take a look at this tomorrow, okay?

[cfehse]

@PEZ If I checkout the branch, build and run the build in debug - the (comment...) form are no longer dimmed. Original Clojure Warrior Extension is not installed. I changed nothing in my settings.

See below: it's a feature.

[cfehse]

@PEZ Wouldn't it be better to really integrate the code into the calva namespace. Renaming everything from "Clojure Warrior" into "Calva Warrior" or better to "Calva <whatever it's called, what the extension actually does>"? Now it is a bit of a mishmash to me.

[cfehse]

@PEZ @kstehn

Perhaps we should rearrange the source directory as well to something like that:
src
src/calva
src/cljs-lib
src/calva-fmt
src/calva-warrior
and then get rid of the src/'ts directories inside the modules as well.

[cfehse]

@PEZ @kstehn
calva-fmt and calva-warrior should really be one module, shouldn't they?

[kstehn]

Yeah i like the idea of the rearrange
there are some things that need some restructering in calva itself

[PEZ]

the (comment...) form are no longer dimmed

That's because I changed that so that they are now italicized instead. 😄 Ignore forms are still dimmed.

[PEZ]

Regarding naming, I'm pretty happy with calling it Clojure Warrior. I don't want to change the settings names, so then it makes sense to call the module something similar to what the settings say.

Regarding rearranging, I am all for that, but it is a different issue than this PR, I'd say.

[cfehse]

Regarding naming, I'm pretty happy with calling it Clojure Warrior. I don't want to change the settings names, so then it makes sense to call the module something similar to what the settings say.

But how does a user now, that these "strange" Clojure Warrior settings belong to the Calva extension? In my experience with users things should be named clearly and comprehensibly. Why not name this Calva Code Formater (Clava-fmt) and Calva Rainbow Brackets (Clojure Warrior). I personally never heard of Clojure Warrior before I installed Calva the first time. And what about old settings with the same name left over from an installation of the "old original" extension - namespace clash? - or does vscode remove all this entirely?

Regarding rearranging, I am all for that, but it is a different issue than this PR, I'd say.

Yes but it should be done not too long after the merge I think.

[cfehse]

That's because I changed that so that they are now italicized instead. 😄 Ignore forms are still dimmed.

That's good! I - and my eyes - like that much better. gg

[cfehse]

@PEZ

There are some unused imports and linter warnings (strangely the import * as isEqual from 'lodash.isequal'; is even shown as an error).

[PEZ]

what about old settings with the same name left over from an installation of the "old original" extension - namespace clash?

That's what I meant. I want people's old settings to continue to work. Which they do now. We can discuss how wise that is with regards to better names, but at least we are not making anything worse this way. 😄

[PEZ]

import * as isEqual from 'lodash.isequal'; is even shown as an error

npm i?

[cfehse]

npm i?

No - I tried that first. The npm page for lodash.isequal recommended the require('lodash.isequal') notation as well. I have no idea why. gg

[cfehse]

@PEZ @kstehn This is ready to merge, isn't it?

[kstehn]

At a glance seems to be fine to me :)

[PEZ]

I decided that it was better to change the name now, rather than later. It is now called ”Calva Highlight”, since that is closest to what it provides. We should probably move the grammar things to this module/subdirectory as well, but that is for later.

In order to not just abandon the users with silently non-functioning settings, I have added a detector for oldly named settings and flash a warning message when those are detected. The message includes information on what the user should now do. To test this, add some settings that are valid for calva.highlight, but prefix with clojureWarrior instead.

[PEZ]

Merged it since you guys were OK with it and I just change things according to previous feedback. Please be alert on any problems that could be related to this change when you have pulled dev.