In general, define-namespace
should work as you expect it to. But if you
need to understand why something is or isn’t being namespaced, here’s
the nitty gritty of how it happens.
Quoted lists (be it with quote
or function
) are namespaced only
of the list is a lambda
form (or a macro
form). Arbitrary lists
are returned untouched (they are way too arbitrary to be handled
sanely). That is:
(define-namespace foo-
(defun infinite (y)
(mapcar
'(lambda (x) (infinite x))
'(not a lambda (infinite x))))
)
expands to
(defun foo-infinite (y)
(mapcar
'(lambda (x) (foo-infinite x))
'(not a lambda (infinite x))))
Note that '(lambda ...)
is bad practice in Emacs, you should use
(lambda ...)
instead (which is also namespaced just fine).
A symbol quoted with quote
(or '
) is never namespaced.
(define-namespace foo-
(defvar var nil)
(defvaralias 'varalias 'var)
(defun fun nil)
(defalias 'alias 'fun)
(defalias 'otheralias 'var)
)
expands to
(defvar foo-var nil)
(defvaralias 'varalias 'var)
(defun foo-fun nil)
(defalias 'alias 'fun)
;;; foo-var is not a function, so:
(defalias 'otheralias 'var)
If you provide the :assume-var-quote
keyword, quoted symbols will be
namespaced as variables instead.
A symbol quoted with function
(or #'
) is assumed to be the name of a
function, and will be namespaced as such if possible. You may provide
the :dont-assume-function-quote
keyword to disable this behaviour,
function
will then be treated like quote
.
(define-namespace foo-
(defun fun (x) x)
(mapcar 'fun somelist)
(mapcar #'fun somelist)
)
expands to
(defun foo-fun (x) x)
(mapcar 'fun somelist)
(mapcar #'foo-fun somelist)
Backticks (or `
) are handled as you would expect. Lists or simbles
quoted with a backtick are treated the same as those quoted with
regular quotes (see above), except anything prefixed by a comma (which
is effectively not quoted) is namespaced as usual.
Local variables take precedence over namespace variables. For instance
(define-namespace foo-
(defvar bar "2")
(defun funca (bar)
(string-to-int bar))
)
expands to
(defvar foo-bar "2")
(defun funca (bar)
(string-to-int bar))
Note how the last bar
isn’t namespaced. That’s because it is local
to the funca
function, and takes precedence over the global
foo-bar
. The argument list of functions, macros, and lambdas are
all local definitions.
By default, this does not happen with let bindings, they are namespaced as usual (if the variable name in question has a global definition). The reason is that let bindings are commonly used to temporarily override global bindings.
You can customize this behaviour with the :no-let-vars
keyword.
Then:
(define-namespace foo- :no-let-vars
(defvar bar "2")
(let ((bar "1"))
(string-to-int bar))
)
will expand to
(defvar foo-bar "2")
(let ((bar "1"))
(string-to-int bar))
Macros are handled in a very intelligent manner.
Names needs to know which parts of a macro’s arguments are
evaluatable forms, and which are just arbitrary symbols. This presents
a challenge because macro arguments could be absolutely anything.
Fortunately, (good) macros already provide that information in their
debug
declaration.
Thus, Names uses the macro’s edebug-spec-list
to find out which
arguments are evaluatable forms, and namespaces only those. Other
arguments are left untouched. Usually, this is not something you’ll
need to worry about, it should just do what you expect from it.
This is only relevant if you write your own macros. If you do, remember to add a debug declaration in them.
The threading macros would require special treatment to namespace
correctly. However, you can use the :functionlike-macros
keyword to
tell Names to treat them as regular functions.
For example, in the following snippet:
(require 'dash)
(define-namespace foo-
:functionlike-macros (-> ->>)
(defvar var nil)
(defun fun (x &optional y)
(concat x y))
(-> "some string"
(fun var)
fun)
)
the (fun var)
part would be namespaced prefectly fine (fun
and
var
will be identified as a function and variable respectively),
because it looks like a regular function call. However, the second use
of fun
will not be correctly namespaced, because that fun
looks
like a variable.
In other words, you should use these macros like this instead:
(-> "some string"
(fun var)
(fun))
If one of your definitions shadows a global definition, you can still
access it by prefixing it with ::
.
(define-namespace foo-
(defun message ()
(message)
(::message "Hi"))
)
expands to
(defun foo-message ()
(foo-message)
(message "Hi"))
When in doubt feel free to use ::
, it will always get removed (as
long as it’s not inside a quote
). You may also change this prefix to
something else with the :prefix
keyword.