Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

automated versioning requiring user input causes QA_QC check to fail. #41

Open
embruna opened this issue Jun 16, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@embruna
Copy link
Collaborator

embruna commented Jun 16, 2023

running the functions to clean heliconia data or create the other data files originally included an automated process asking the user to input responses regarding data versioning. This causes the automated QA-QC / data validation action to fail (see log here). I have pulled the versioning out and made it manual to avoid this and will try to automate the versioning the way the Weecology group does with the Portal data

@embruna embruna added bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels Jun 16, 2023
@Aariq
Copy link
Member

Aariq commented Jun 16, 2023

One possible solution (I think) would be to use if(!interactive()) {don't update the version}. Then you would only be able to version the data manually, but the action should still run

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants