Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"CBA_fnc_taskDefend" does not ignore locked statics. #1013

Closed
Neciota opened this issue Oct 21, 2018 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1016
Closed

"CBA_fnc_taskDefend" does not ignore locked statics. #1013

Neciota opened this issue Oct 21, 2018 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1016
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@Neciota
Copy link

Neciota commented Oct 21, 2018

Arma 3 Version: 1.84 (stable)
CBA Version: 3.9.0 (stable)

Mods:

- CBA_A3
- ACE3
- CUP Weapons/Vehicles/Units
- ACRE2

Description:
AI groups given the taskDefend function will mount statics that are fully locked (not just locked for players).

Steps to reproduce:

  • Place AI group.
  • Give AI group CBA_fnc_taskDefend.
  • Place static near them.
  • Lock the static.

Where did the issue occur?

  • Dedicated
@commy2
Copy link
Contributor

commy2 commented Oct 21, 2018

What happens when an AI tries to man a locked static weapon?

@Neciota
Copy link
Author

Neciota commented Oct 21, 2018

It kills my platoon with the ZU-23 it mounted.

@dedmen
Copy link
Contributor

dedmen commented Oct 21, 2018

"CBA_fnc_taskDefend" does not ignore locked statics.

Is that a typo? You mean it "does ignore locked statics" right?

@Drofseh
Copy link
Contributor

Drofseh commented Oct 21, 2018

Doesn't seem like a type to me.
Statics are not ignored when locked, the AI get into them.

@dedmen
Copy link
Contributor

dedmen commented Oct 22, 2018

Ahh. I read it as "does ignore locked-statics" which they don't. As they enter it.
But it's meant as "does ignore (locked) statics"
Dedmen being dumb again

@commy2 commy2 added the Bug label Oct 23, 2018
@commy2 commy2 added this to the 3.9.1 milestone Oct 23, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants