CBA_fnc_waitUntilAndExecute should accept 0 as timeout

[felixlinker]

Hi there,

I think CBA_fnc_waitUntilAndExecute would behave more intuitively if the value for no timeout would be -1 or something else truly less than zero.
In my case there is a timeout that might resolve to zero and in this case I would expect CBA_fnc_waitUntilAndExecute to execute the code immediately.

Right now, it treats a zero as if no timeout was given: https://github.com/CBATeam/CBA_A3/blob/master/addons/common/fnc_waitUntilAndExecute.sqf#L40

[commy2]

You mean it should execute the timeout code next frame if timeout was set to 0 explicitly?

[felixlinker]

Or just immediately.

[felixlinker]

This is what I think would be better.