-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove codecov from ci #933
Conversation
name: codecov-umbrella # optional | ||
fail_ci_if_error: true # optional (default = false) | ||
verbose: true # optional (default = false) | ||
- name: Archive code coverage results |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this can stay
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking of removing this portion instead? https://github.com/CMSgov/bcda-app/pull/933/files#diff-e42b2b9794d0333e41c8e218ece5897ea7395746b5e07d08fb85b53e36d15043L71-L74
If we remove the codecov report generation but keep in the artifact, would it fail when it searches the path for the testcoverage.out
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's what I'm thinking; it's going to look for code-coverage-report and then fail
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
go has built-in test coverage tools, so the file still gets generated, from what I can tell.
.github/workflows/ci-workflow.yml
Outdated
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v2 | ||
with: | ||
name: code-coverage-report | ||
path: ./test_results/latest/testcoverage.out |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thru here
🎫 Ticket
n/a
🛠 Changes
removing codecov from CI, since sonarqube is doing the same thing and tokenless is hitting a github api limit.
ℹ️ Context for reviewers
Link to discussion on tokenless codecov generation and rate limiting.
✅ Acceptance Validation
n/a
🔒 Security Implications
If any security implications apply, add Jason Ashbaugh (GitHub username: StewGoin) as a reviewer and do not merge this PR without his approval.