Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Noise and discontinuities in WOA #103

Open
aekiss opened this issue Jul 11, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Noise and discontinuities in WOA #103

aekiss opened this issue Jul 11, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@aekiss
Copy link
Contributor

aekiss commented Jul 11, 2018

Just splitting this off as a separate issue from #74 to document it now that it's fallen off Slack.

World Ocean Atlas 2013 v2 has spurious discontinuities and noise in salinity and temperature (and possibly other fields), particularly in the 0.25deg product.

For example, SSS has >3psu discontinuities in the Kara Sea in the monthly climatology woa13_decav_s01_04v2.nc.
screen shot 2018-01-12 at fri 12-1 11 29am
These move around and disappear in different months and extend down to 15m.
woa13v2-sss
Discontinuities and noise also appear in near-surface temperature in the same pattern:
screen shot 2018-07-06 at fri 6-7 5 53pm

In addition to the discontinuities there are large areas with pixel-scale noise in both SSS and SST.

This is apparently an artefact of the interpolation method, as this region seems to be entirely unsupported by observations in January.
screen shot 2018-01-12 at fri 12-1 11 52am

There are also large-scale differences between the 1deg and 0.25deg products in the Arctic, for example in the Beaufort Sea and around Severnaya Zemlya, and both also display differing spurious fonts (e.g. in the Beaufort Sea) - click on this image to enlarge:
screen shot 2018-01-24 at wed 24-1 9 47am

I informed NOAA about this in January. As of late June it had not been investigated but they said they'd look into it. They are working on a release of WOA18 scheduled for September - hopefully it won't contain these flaws. In the meantime our WOA13v2-based restoring field will need smoothing - see #74.

@aekiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

aekiss commented Jan 30, 2019

Unfortunately the same problems afflict WOA2018-prerelease salinity (https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/woa18/woa18data.html, downloaded here: /short/v45/aek156/woa18-prerelease).

@aekiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

aekiss commented Jan 31, 2019

Simon suggested we check whether the PHC climatology is better in the Arctic: http://psc.apl.washington.edu/nonwp_projects/PHC/Climatology.html
The website says "PHC = WOA (Levitus) '98 everywhere except in our arctic domain, where we have blended in the AOA field (from EWG), and the BIO data to produce a more realistic arctic region."

This has global monthly T & S climatologies, but only at 1 degree resolution.

@aekiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

aekiss commented Jan 31, 2019

However I gather that WOA13v2 is better than WOA98 in terms of Southern Ocean polynyas so perhaps that rules out PHC...?

@aekiss aekiss changed the title Noise and discontinuities in WOA13v2 Noise and discontinuities in WOA Aug 21, 2024
@aekiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

aekiss commented Aug 21, 2024

Noise and discontinuities are also present in WOA23 temperature (top) and salinity (bottom) in /g/data/ik11/observations/woa23:
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 1 48 47 pm
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 2 35 40 pm

@aekiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

aekiss commented Aug 21, 2024

Also see COSIMA/access-om3#161 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant