From c9c73f5d2550f00e9b952e65d05421721b73ee6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philipp Oppermann Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:25:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Refer to `add` method instead of `offset` The `align_offset` method returns an `usize`, so using `add` makes more sense than using `offset`, which takes an `isize`. --- src/libcore/ptr/mod.rs | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/libcore/ptr/mod.rs b/src/libcore/ptr/mod.rs index 337f3440b436e..e8c988b921ac3 100644 --- a/src/libcore/ptr/mod.rs +++ b/src/libcore/ptr/mod.rs @@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@ impl *const T { /// `usize::max_value()`. /// /// The offset is expressed in number of `T` elements, and not bytes. The value returned can be - /// used with the `offset` method. + /// used with the `add` method. /// /// There are no guarantees whatsover that offsetting the pointer will not overflow or go /// beyond the allocation that the pointer points into. It is up to the caller to ensure that @@ -2335,7 +2335,7 @@ impl *mut T { /// `usize::max_value()`. /// /// The offset is expressed in number of `T` elements, and not bytes. The value returned can be - /// used with the `offset` method. + /// used with the `add` method. /// /// There are no guarantees whatsover that offsetting the pointer will not overflow or go /// beyond the allocation that the pointer points into. It is up to the caller to ensure that