Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: add templates from custom nodes to the template gallery #1008

Open
1 task done
JorgeR81 opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2032
Open
1 task done

[Feature Request]: add templates from custom nodes to the template gallery #1008

JorgeR81 opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2032
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@JorgeR81
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues and checked the recent builds/commits

What would your feature do ?

Some custom nodes also have template workflows ( e.g. IPAdapter plus )

https://github.com/cubiq/ComfyUI_IPAdapter_plus/tree/main/examples

It would be nice if these were also displayed in the new template gallery.

gt

Proposed workflow

The images could be smaller ( e.g. 6 per line ) and the gallery scrollable.

You could use a badge to indicate the custom node name.

If the workflow is just a json ( no image ) you can use use an image / file icon.

Once the custom node creators are aware of this feature they would also probably want to use template images.

Additional information

No response

@JorgeR81 JorgeR81 added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 26, 2024
@JorgeR81
Copy link
Author

If possible you could also add inpaint and outpaint templates, without custom nodes. 

There are outpaint worflows with nice results, but they require custom nodes.
https://github.com/camenduru/outpaint-flux-tost

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants