You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
Structural comparison tables does not seem to take identifier and context into account. Well, it is hard to know what is what in the table too: is the first model to column headers or the row headers? We should add a description one liner to say what is what.
Assuming the first model is the column headers, then
sidarthe2 var 'I' with concept 'infected population'
dashtbali var 'H' with concepts 'infected population', 'hospitalization', etc
Then I was expecting the matrix cell to have '<=' instead of '='.
Note: I curated some of the concepts and Saved. Maybe that did not propagate?
Screenshots
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
Structural comparison tables does not seem to take identifier and context into account. Well, it is hard to know what is what in the table too: is the first model to column headers or the row headers? We should add a description one liner to say what is what.
Assuming the first model is the column headers, then
Then I was expecting the matrix cell to have '<=' instead of '='.
Note: I curated some of the concepts and Saved. Maybe that did not propagate?
Screenshots
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: