You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In case one wants to have a step wise reduction in skin thickness from wing root to tip, the obvious way would be to use a number of different cells along the span direction to set different values for thickness.
However, if at the same time a continuous stringer set shall be defined for the wing box between root and tip, this would require one large cell spanning from root to tip and from e.g. front spar to rear spar.
This would mean that the stringer cell would overlap with the group of thickness cells. The problem here is, that the cell has for example a required material definition. This means skin material would need to be defined in the stringer cell as well as in the group of thickness cells. Due to the overlap of cells, this could lead to inconsistent settings regarding skin material or even thickness.
Is this usage intended for cells, or is there another way to solve this?
An additional point would be to allow such thickness gradation also for internal structural components such as spars or ribs, which is currently not possible, as no cells exist in these components.
Would this speak for some new definition allowing thickness gradation outside of the cell to allow re-usage within spars and ribs?
This discussion was converted from issue #568 on November 02, 2021 13:17.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
In case one wants to have a step wise reduction in skin thickness from wing root to tip, the obvious way would be to use a number of different cells along the span direction to set different values for thickness.
However, if at the same time a continuous stringer set shall be defined for the wing box between root and tip, this would require one large cell spanning from root to tip and from e.g. front spar to rear spar.
This would mean that the stringer cell would overlap with the group of thickness cells. The problem here is, that the cell has for example a required material definition. This means skin material would need to be defined in the stringer cell as well as in the group of thickness cells. Due to the overlap of cells, this could lead to inconsistent settings regarding skin material or even thickness.
Is this usage intended for cells, or is there another way to solve this?
An additional point would be to allow such thickness gradation also for internal structural components such as spars or ribs, which is currently not possible, as no cells exist in these components.
Would this speak for some new definition allowing thickness gradation outside of the cell to allow re-usage within spars and ribs?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions