-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 813
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[consul] add maintenance metric to Consul catalog. #3708
Open
diogokiss
wants to merge
1
commit into
DataDog:master
Choose a base branch
from
diogokiss:maintenance-metric
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This PR is a dependency to DataDog/integrations-core#1267.
4 tasks
diogokiss
pushed a commit
to diogokiss/integrations-core
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2018
Currently, if a node in Consul is set into maintenance state, it is reported as a node in critical state to Datadog metrics. This makes it confusing to determine by the metric whether it is a node failing with problems or an planned intervention. A user made a PR to Datadog some time ago, but it was not merged due to Datadog code organization changes and got forgotten (DataDog/dd-agent#2496). I'm pushing the change forward. I've tested it using dd-agent version 5.8.0. This PR also depends on DataDog/dd-agent#3708
diogokiss
pushed a commit
to diogokiss/integrations-core
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2018
Currently, if a node in Consul is set into maintenance state, it is reported as a node in critical state to Datadog metrics. This makes it confusing to determine by the metric whether it is a node failing with problems or an planned intervention. A user made a PR to Datadog some time ago, but it was not merged due to Datadog code organization changes and got forgotten (DataDog/dd-agent#2496). I'm pushing the change forward. I've tested it using dd-agent version 5.8.0. This PR also depends on DataDog/dd-agent#3708
diogokiss
pushed a commit
to diogokiss/integrations-core
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2018
Currently, if a node in Consul is set into maintenance state, it is reported as a node in critical state to Datadog metrics. This makes it confusing to determine by the metric whether it is a node failing with problems or an planned intervention. A user made a PR to Datadog some time ago, but it was not merged due to Datadog code organization changes and got forgotten (DataDog/dd-agent#2496). I'm pushing the change forward. I've tested it using dd-agent version 5.8.0. This PR also depends on DataDog/dd-agent#3708
diogokiss
pushed a commit
to diogokiss/integrations-core
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2018
Currently, if a node in Consul is set into maintenance state, it is reported as a node in critical state to Datadog metrics. This makes it confusing to determine by the metric whether it is a node failing with problems or an planned intervention. A user made a PR to Datadog some time ago, but it was not merged due to Datadog code organization changes and got forgotten (DataDog/dd-agent#2496). I'm pushing the change forward. I've tested it using dd-agent version 5.8.0. This PR also depends on DataDog/dd-agent#3708
diogokiss
pushed a commit
to diogokiss/integrations-core
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2018
Currently, if a node in Consul is set into maintenance state, it is reported as a node in critical state to Datadog metrics. This makes it confusing to determine by the metric whether it is a node failing with problems or an planned intervention. A user made a PR to Datadog some time ago, but it was not merged due to Datadog code organization changes and got forgotten (DataDog/dd-agent#2496). I'm pushing the change forward. I've tested it using dd-agent version 5.8.0. This PR also depends on DataDog/dd-agent#3708
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a dependency to DataDog/integrations-core#1267.
What does this PR do?
It adds a constant to AgentCheck class called MAINTENANCE.
Motivation
This PR is a dependency to DataDog/integrations-core#1267.
Testing Guidelines
An overview on testing
is available in our contribution guidelines.
Additional Notes
This PR is a dependency to DataDog/integrations-core#1267.