Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

proposal: move away from gopkg.in as the canonical import path #848

Closed
gbbr opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

proposal: move away from gopkg.in as the canonical import path #848

gbbr opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
ack proposal/accepted Accepted proposals proposal more in depth change that requires full team approval v2.0

Comments

@gbbr
Copy link
Contributor

gbbr commented Feb 18, 2021

Given the fact that we've now switched to modules, it should no longer be necessary to use gopkg.in for import paths as a dependency and we can leave it at github.com

@gbbr gbbr added proposal more in depth change that requires full team approval v2.0 labels Feb 18, 2021
@knusbaum knusbaum added ack and removed v2.0 labels Dec 16, 2021
@roccoblues
Copy link
Contributor

@felixge @knusbaum this issue and the duplicate #867 are both closed. Is this still actively tracked somewhere? We're currently experiencing issues because gopkg.in is not available. Thanks!

@felixge
Copy link
Member

felixge commented Dec 9, 2022

This issue is still open I think? Sorry to hear about the gopkg.in issue. We'll discuss bumping the priority on this. We've been hesitant to make a move because it's going to be disruptive to our entire user base, but we'll have to rethink that if the reliability problems continue.

@felixge
Copy link
Member

felixge commented Dec 9, 2022

My colleague @ajgajg1134 just pointed out that this might be related to golang/go#57185

@roccoblues
Copy link
Contributor

roccoblues commented Dec 9, 2022 via email

@roccoblues
Copy link
Contributor

roccoblues commented Dec 9, 2022 via email

@ajgajg1134 ajgajg1134 added v2.0 proposal/accepted Accepted proposals labels Jan 24, 2023
@darccio
Copy link
Member

darccio commented Nov 30, 2023

Fixed in #2300 (for v2, not released yet)

@darccio darccio closed this as completed Nov 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ack proposal/accepted Accepted proposals proposal more in depth change that requires full team approval v2.0
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants