Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add comment to Matrixfile expansion #3943

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add comment to Matrixfile expansion #3943

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

marcotc
Copy link
Member

@marcotc marcotc commented Sep 24, 2024

Adds a comment explaining what the recently introduced code does in the Matrixfile.

@marcotc marcotc added the dev/internal Other internal work that does not need to be included in the changelog label Sep 24, 2024
@marcotc marcotc requested a review from a team as a code owner September 24, 2024 19:17
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.84%. Comparing base (4fff83a) to head (6cad77c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3943      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.85%   97.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1303     1303              
  Lines       78139    78139              
  Branches     3894     3894              
==========================================
- Hits        76462    76455       -7     
- Misses       1677     1684       +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
97.84% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-09-24 19:54:44

Comparing candidate commit 6cad77c in PR branch add-comment with baseline commit 4fff83a in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 23 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

Copy link
Member

@ivoanjo ivoanjo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@TonyCTHsu TonyCTHsu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Modify the comment for the correct data structure

@@ -284,6 +284,8 @@
'graphql-1.13' => '❌ 2.5 / ✅ 2.6 / ✅ 2.7 / ✅ 3.0 / ✅ 3.1 / ✅ 3.2 / ✅ 3.3 / ✅ 3.4 / ✅ jruby',
}
}.each_with_object({}) do |(tasks, spec_metadata), hash|
# Explode arrays of task names into individual tasks
# e.g. ['rails', 'railsdisableenv'] => {'...'} becomes [['rails7', '...'], ['railsdisableenv7', '...']]
Copy link
Contributor

@TonyCTHsu TonyCTHsu Sep 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# e.g. ['rails', 'railsdisableenv'] => {'...'} becomes [['rails7', '...'], ['railsdisableenv7', '...']]
# e.g. ['rails', 'railsdisableenv'] => {'...'} becomes 'rails7' => {'...'}, 'railsdisableenv7' => {'...'}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dev/internal Other internal work that does not need to be included in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants