Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build(deps): bump anyhow from 1.0.86 to 1.0.89 #247

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Sep 16, 2024

Bumps anyhow from 1.0.86 to 1.0.89.

Release notes

Sourced from anyhow's releases.

1.0.89

  • Make anyhow::Error's UnwindSafe and RefUnwindSafe impl consistently available between versions of Rust newer and older than 1.72 (#386)

1.0.88

  • Documentation improvements

1.0.87

  • Support more APIs, including Error::new and Error::chain, in no-std mode on Rust 1.81+ (#383)
Commits
  • 9d3fb6d Release 1.0.89
  • 830c399 Merge pull request #386 from dtolnay/unwindsafe
  • 8454be3 Ensure UnwindSafe even with "backtrace" feature enabled and old Rust
  • a85e414 Add more autotraits tests
  • 139f266 Release 1.0.88
  • aa3ab2b Merge pull request #385 from dtolnay/docnostd
  • 44c3767 Update documentation on no-std error type conversions
  • afe93e7 Release 1.0.87
  • d58fa4b Fix outdated html_root_url
  • c18d807 Disable unused doc_cfg feature
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [anyhow](https://github.com/dtolnay/anyhow) from 1.0.86 to 1.0.89.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/dtolnay/anyhow/releases)
- [Commits](dtolnay/anyhow@1.0.86...1.0.89)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: anyhow
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner September 16, 2024 15:45
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file rust Pull requests that update Rust code labels Sep 16, 2024
@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner September 16, 2024 15:45
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Regression Detector (DogStatsD)

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 37e2931d-0d0d-4844-8c29-1416c2964b9a

Baseline: 7.55.2
Comparison: 7.55.3

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.02, +0.05] 1
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.02, +0.04] 1
dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.04, +0.04] 1
dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.03, +0.03] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput -0.02 [-0.05, +0.02] 1
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts ingress throughput -0.03 [-0.09, +0.02] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts ingress throughput -0.07 [-0.12, -0.02] 1
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only memory utilization -0.74 [-0.91, -0.57] 1

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Regression Detector (Saluki)

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 9e7d0f17-53b5-4788-8516-e5406bb6bcb0

Baseline: 9f2b116
Comparison: 13bee1e

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only memory utilization +2.00 [+1.79, +2.21] 1
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.02, +0.05] 1
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.02, +0.03] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.02, +0.02] 1
dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining_no_allocs ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.02, +0.02] 1
dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.27, +0.25] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput -0.03 [-0.07, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput -0.04 [-0.07, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput -0.91 [-1.03, -0.80] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit ingress throughput -0.98 [-4.21, +2.24] 1

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Regression Detector Links

Experiment Result Links

experiment link(s)
dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining (ADP only) [Profiling (ADP)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining_no_allocs (ADP only) [Profiling (ADP)] [SMP Dashboard]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file rust Pull requests that update Rust code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants