-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document the ability to execute the main plugin functionality directly #18
Comments
Before making docs consider refactoring of plugin's class and entry point method's names. In my opinion they're not descriptive, especially the latter. Both (class and method) should be named in a way like Maybe For backward compatibility you can then extend |
Valid point, will clarify the method name. As naming a thing is hard, @frenck: do you have any quams about |
Now when I think of it, it should not be named So maybe We all know phrase about naming and invalidating cache 🤣 |
Added documentation to the README, leaving the method/class rename for another issue. |
Resolved by #29 will be included in the upcoming |
Problem/Motivation
The main functionality of this plugin (installing a custom code sniff) can be called separately (see isue #4).
However, this functionality has not (yet) been documented. It could be useful for users to be made aware of this feature in the documentation.
Expected behaviour / Actual behaviour / Steps to reproduce
Does not apply
Proposed changes
Document what the future is and how it can be used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: