Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plotting extent #123

Open
lgrimley opened this issue Sep 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Plotting extent #123

lgrimley opened this issue Sep 6, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@lgrimley
Copy link

lgrimley commented Sep 6, 2023

I have a model that covers more than one UTM zone. When I use the plot_basemap() function it cuts off and only shows the area of the model that is in the UTM zone that the model as been assigned to. Is there a way for it to clip to the extent of the region instead?
region

@DirkEilander
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the suggestion @lgrimley! I'll need to figure out why this happens, but agree this should be changed. If it is urgent, as a work around, you can copy the plot_basemaps method and adapt/delete the line where the plot extent is set https://github.com/Deltares/hydromt_sfincs/blob/main/hydromt_sfincs/plots.py#L189

@DirkEilander
Copy link
Contributor

Currently the approach is to use the projection of the data. This could lead to negative coordinates if a model spans multiple UTM zones with cartopy doesn't seem to like (this assumption needs to be checked). Instead of a UTM zone it would perhaps be better if the model uses another CRS that can describe the entire model in that case.

@lgrimley can you check if this error persists if you reproject the model grid to e.g. WGS84 and then plot it?

sf = SfincsModel(<root>, mode='r')
sf._grid = sf.grid.raster.reproject('epsg:4326')
sf.plot_basemap()

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants