You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not really
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like an officially designated value for the web+spoolman: scheme for clearing the active spool in software that integrates with spoolman (e.g. Moonraker)
Describe alternatives you've considered
Using a different scheme (e.g. moonraker:clear-spool)
Using the special value "0" web+spoolman:sp-0
Additional context
I have a barcode scanner hooked up to ESPHome, that generates API requests to moonraker whenever a spoolman QR is scanned. Since I also need a way to suspend tracking, I am currently using web+spoolman:clear, which will cause the esphome to POST to moonraker in a way that causes it to suspend tracking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not really
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like an officially designated value for the
web+spoolman:
scheme for clearing the active spool in software that integrates with spoolman (e.g. Moonraker)Describe alternatives you've considered
moonraker:clear-spool
)web+spoolman:sp-0
Additional context
I have a barcode scanner hooked up to ESPHome, that generates API requests to moonraker whenever a spoolman QR is scanned. Since I also need a way to suspend tracking, I am currently using
web+spoolman:clear
, which will cause the esphome to POST to moonraker in a way that causes it to suspend tracking.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: