You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The fates test ERP_D_P32x2_Ld3.f19_g17.I2000Clm50FatesCru.cheyenne_intel.clm-FatesColdDef is failing the run due to hitting the wallclock limit when run with ctsm5.1.dev095 and later.
General bug information
CTSM version you are using: ctsm5.1.dev095
Does this bug cause significantly incorrect results in the model's science? No
Looking at the logs, it seems like the case gets 'stuck' somewhere in the initialization and then ends hitting the wallclock limit. The cesm.log has the following at the end of the log:
Important details of your setup / configuration so we can reproduce the bug
This was tested with fates tag sci.1.57.0_api.23.0.0. I also tested this with dev096 and dev094. The case successfully runs in a reasonable amount time for dev094.
This was first seen in the course of dealing with NGEET/fates#861 (comment) and could be avoided with implementing #1762. In that fates issue it should be noted that the issues persists for this threading configuration in both debug off and on modes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
glemieux
changed the title
P32x2 fates test failing on dev095P32x2 fates test fails to run on dev095
May 19, 2022
Brief summary of bug
The fates test
ERP_D_P32x2_Ld3.f19_g17.I2000Clm50FatesCru.cheyenne_intel.clm-FatesColdDef
is failing the run due to hitting the wallclock limit when run with ctsm5.1.dev095 and later.General bug information
CTSM version you are using: ctsm5.1.dev095
Does this bug cause significantly incorrect results in the model's science? No
Configurations affected: ctsm-fates
Details of bug
Failed case can be found here on Cheyenne:
Looking at the logs, it seems like the case gets 'stuck' somewhere in the initialization and then ends hitting the wallclock limit. The cesm.log has the following at the end of the log:
Important details of your setup / configuration so we can reproduce the bug
This was tested with fates tag
sci.1.57.0_api.23.0.0
. I also tested this with dev096 and dev094. The case successfully runs in a reasonable amount time for dev094.This was first seen in the course of dealing with NGEET/fates#861 (comment) and could be avoided with implementing #1762. In that fates issue it should be noted that the issues persists for this threading configuration in both debug off and on modes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: