Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Roslynator (C#) support to report-converter #3764

Closed
PeterKaszab opened this issue Oct 16, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3765
Closed

Add Roslynator (C#) support to report-converter #3764

PeterKaszab opened this issue Oct 16, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3765
Labels
enhancement 🌟 other-analyzer 💬 Analysers which CodeChecker offers only report conversion of, but no driving report-converter 🔄 tools 🛠️ Meta-tag for all the additional tools supplied with CodeChecker: plist2html, tu_collector, etc.

Comments

@PeterKaszab
Copy link
Contributor

Currently C# is not supported by CodeChecker. I have tested multiple options and I think Roslynator is a great tool to analyze C# projects:

The Roslynator project contains several analyzers built on top of Microsoft Roslyn. It also provides a .NET tool for running Roslyn code analysis from the command line. It is not limited to Microsoft and Roslynator analyzers, it supports any Roslyn anaylzer. It can also report MSBuild compiler diagnostics.

@whisperity whisperity added tools 🛠️ Meta-tag for all the additional tools supplied with CodeChecker: plist2html, tu_collector, etc. other-analyzer 💬 Analysers which CodeChecker offers only report conversion of, but no driving report-converter 🔄 labels Oct 17, 2022
@whisperity whisperity added this to the release 6.21.0 milestone Oct 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement 🌟 other-analyzer 💬 Analysers which CodeChecker offers only report conversion of, but no driving report-converter 🔄 tools 🛠️ Meta-tag for all the additional tools supplied with CodeChecker: plist2html, tu_collector, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants