-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-06-21] [$1000] DEV: console error on opening Share code of thread #19985
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @sophiepintoraetz ( |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Console error on Share code page from thread chat What is the root cause of that problem?
App/src/components/QRShare/index.js Lines 74 to 75 in d661708
This was introduced in #18636. This checklist item was skipped during PR review:
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?wrap with
|
This has been resolved as a part of #18968 and the reporter paid. I am unable to reproduce. |
@sophiepintoraetz this is different issue and reproducible in dev when user open share code of thread |
@gadhiyamanan I am unable to reproduce it - as mentioned before so there needs to be clearer reproduction steps in order to progress this through. 2023-06-02_17-38-36.mp4 |
steps are the same but it is reproducible only in the dev(main branch). I think you are checking in staging or Production that's why you are not able to reproduce Screen.Recording.2023-06-02.at.11.23.20.AM.mov |
Bump @sophiepintoraetz ^^ |
@robertjchen - this is on dev and I think introduced from #18630 - can you reproduce here? 🙏 |
I was able to reproduce this in local dev 👍 |
It was not introduced by #18630 since that feature came out prior to threads, and so this is an isolated bug. |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~016f17d9321b19bf9c |
Current assignee @sophiepintoraetz is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @mananjadhav ( |
Current assignee @robertjchen is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
The fix I came to locally matches @situchan 's proposal (though I used |
Either approach is fine but I recently noticed that PR reviewers recommend to use |
ok, perfect! cc: @mananjadhav for 👍 on proposed changes |
🎯 ⚡️ Woah @mananjadhav / @situchan, great job pushing this forwards! ⚡️ The pull request got merged within 2 working days of assignment, so this job is eligible for a 50% #urgency bonus 🎉
On to the next one 🚀 |
Triggered auto assignment to @dylanexpensify ( |
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
@dylanexpensify - I just need you to action the payments once the regression period has passed (PR still going through QA so I think that will populate in the GH soon) Job is here! https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~016f17d9321b19bf9c |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.27-7 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-06-21. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
@gadhiyamanan and @situchan - contracts are with you! @mananjadhav - if you can go through the BZ checklist, I'll be able to release payment to you too. |
@sophiepintoraetz accepted, thanks! |
@sophiepintoraetz the offer is not available anymore |
The first instance when we added the I've added this comment on the offending PR.
We already have a checklist item here but we missed the particular condition in the code. I don't think any further updates are required and I don't think we need a regression test either. |
Thanks @mananjadhav - releasing payment!
How did we miss highlighting it? Does it mean someone marked it off but it wsn't actually completed? @situchan - sorry! I swear I sent the offer to you but I think Upwork was messing with me. You should have a new offer now. |
Payments all set so closing! |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
should not show any console error
Actual Result:
shows console error
Workaround:
Can the user still use Expensify without this being fixed? Have you informed them of the workaround?
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: 1.3.20.2
Reproducible in staging?: needs reproduction
Reproducible in production?: needs reproduction
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Screen.Recording.2023-05-30.at.2.50.20.PM.mov
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @gadhiyamanan
Slack conversation:
https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1685430101536709
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: