[TS migration] Migrate 'WalletSection.js' component to TypeScript

[melvin-bot]

TypeScript migration

Make sure you read through our TypeScript's style guide, cheatsheet and PropTypes conversion table before you start working on this migration issue.

Files

Path	Dependencies
src/components/WalletSection.js	4

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @cead22, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

[fedirjh]

cc @cead22 seems like this was closed without c+ review payment.

[cead22]

Sorry, the process wasn't clear for me

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @peterdbarkerUK (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

• This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
• This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
  • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
• This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
  • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
  • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
• This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
  • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
• I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

[melvin-bot]

Current assignee @peterdbarkerUK is eligible for the NewFeature assigner, not assigning anyone new.

[cead22]

Bump @peterdbarkerUK

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @miljakljajic (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details.

[miljakljajic]

Sorry @cead22 I'm not 100% clear on what the CTA is for this one? According to the SO I can decide whether or not to move this forward as a P/S or not?

[cead22]

The CTA is to issue payment to the C+ for their review. We had closed this issue without issuing that payment, that's why I reopened and added the new feature label. Thanks

[cead22]

There were a few reviewers of the PR but @fedirjh was the one that completed the checklist

[cead22]

@miljakljajic bump

[miljakljajic]

Sorry, paying!

[miljakljajic]

@fedirjh offer is ready for you to accept when you can!

[miljakljajic]

Paid!