Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New architecture] Money request placeholder amount is misplaced sometimes #36728

Closed
1 of 6 tasks
WoLewicki opened this issue Feb 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
1 of 6 tasks
Labels

Comments

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor

WoLewicki commented Feb 16, 2024

If you haven't already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


This issue is related to the ongoing new architecture adoption. It was reported on the build with new architecture enabled on the relevant PR.


Version Number: 1.4.42-1
Reproducible in staging?: no
Reproducible in production?: no
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @ishpaul777 here
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

Break down in numbered steps

Expected Result:

Placeholder is positioned correctly

Actual Result:

Placeholder is positioned too high sometimes

Workaround:

Fixed by 36e2d0c (#13767)

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Available in the linked comment.

View all open jobs on GitHub

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

not able to repro

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Monthly KSv2 label Feb 20, 2024
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Will be tested once the PR is deployed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants