[HOLD for payment 2024-05-09] [HOLD for payment 2024-05-08] Send invoice - App returns to member list when selecting a workspace via keyboard

[m-natarajan]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.4.68-0
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: No (New feature)
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

Precondition:

• There are at least two workspaces.

1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
2. Go to FAB > Send invoice.
3. Enter amount and select a participant.
4. Click on the workspace under "Send from".
5. Use keyboard to navigate and select a different workspace.
6. Repeat Step 2 to 5 but using mouse instead of keyboard.

Expected Result:

When selecting a workspace using keyboard, app will return to confirmation page (Step 6 behavior).

Actual Result:

When selecting a workspace using keyboard, app returns to participant selection page.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6466063_1714436346359.key_invoice.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @garrettmknight

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @marcaaron (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @garrettmknight (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[m-natarajan]

We think this bug might be related to #wave-collect - Release 1

[m-natarajan]

@garrettmknight FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors.

[marcaaron]

Haven't got a chance to look at this yet, but @cristipaval seems related to #40015

It looks like something we could fix as a follow up.

[cristipaval]

Thanks @marcaaron! yes, we're on it

[waterim]

Hello, Im Artem from Callstack and would like to take this one
Cc @cristipaval

[cristipaval]

CP requested already

[cristipaval]

PR merged and deployed to staging

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.68-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Fix selection of a workspace via keyboard enter #41332

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-05-08. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @waterim does not require payment (Contractor)
• @shubham1206agra requires payment (Needs manual offer from BZ)

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@shubham1206agra] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@shubham1206agra] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@shubham1206agra] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@shubham1206agra] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@shubham1206agra] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@garrettmknight] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[shubham1206agra]

No payment is required here. You can close this.

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.69-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Fix selection of a workspace via keyboard enter #41332

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-05-09. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @waterim does not require payment (Contractor)
• @shubham1206agra requires payment (Needs manual offer from BZ)

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@shubham1206agra] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@shubham1206agra] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@shubham1206agra] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@shubham1206agra] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@shubham1206agra] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@garrettmknight] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon: