Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chat - Different placement of sender name and message on staging vs production #46489

Closed
6 tasks done
izarutskaya opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 13 comments
Closed
6 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Engineering Hourly KSv2

Comments

@izarutskaya
Copy link

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 9.0.14-1
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Issue reported by: Applause-Internal team

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to any chat.
  3. Send a message.
  4. Compare the placement of sender name and message on staging and production.

Expected Result:

The placement of sender name and message on staging will be the same as that on production.

Actual Result:

The placement of sender name and message on staging is different from production.
On staging, there is some spacing between sender name and message.
The sender name is also a bit lower compared to production.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6556720_1722287856118.20240730_051442.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub
Bug6556720_1722287892887!Screenshot_2024-07-30_at_05 17 50

@izarutskaya izarutskaya added DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. DeployBlocker Indicates it should block deploying the API labels Jul 30, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @muttmuure (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @iwiznia (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Engineering Hourly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Jul 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@izarutskaya
Copy link
Author

We think this issue might be related to the #vip-vsb

@izarutskaya
Copy link
Author

Production
image (6)

@gijoe0295
Copy link
Contributor

Offending PR: #40692 at this line:

lineHeight: variables.lineHeightXXLarge,

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

I don't think this counts as a regression. It is intentional change. @VickyStash

@VickyStash
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think this counts as a regression. It is intentional change. @VickyStash

Yeah, otherwise, there were problems with the date alignment on web platforms or emojis cut off on ios for names with emojis

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm we do not want to be changing the line height across the app like this though, notice how in the bug report above we now have a space under the sender name. I think we need to revert the offending PR.

@iwiznia
Copy link
Contributor

iwiznia commented Jul 30, 2024

Context https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1722351467920939

There's a revert here #46463 and a potential fix here #46478 and both are getting adhoc builds to test them out.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

We will have to rethink of a better solution in that case.

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

#46463 was reverted, so let's retest this on staging...

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

easy enough, confirmed this is fixed

image

@roryabraham roryabraham removed the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Jul 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Engineering Hourly KSv2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants