Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Concierge - Concierge Task is not completed when track an expense #51980

Open
2 of 8 tasks
lanitochka17 opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 8 comments
Open
2 of 8 tasks
Assignees
Labels
Engineering Monthly KSv2 Reviewing Has a PR in review

Comments

@lanitochka17
Copy link

lanitochka17 commented Nov 4, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 9.0.57-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught on HybridApp, is this reproducible on New Expensify Standalone?: N/A
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/5175984&group_by=cases:section_id&group_order=asc&group_id=229043
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): gocemate+a2749@gmail.com
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Action Performed:

  1. Create a new user
  2. Select the purpose "Track and budget expenses"> Complete the flow
  3. Go to FAB> Track expense> Complete the flow
  4. Go to Concierge chat and take a look at Track task

Expected Result:

Track task should be completed since user create Track expense

Actual Result:

Track Task in Concierge chat is not completed when track an expense

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Standalone
  • Android: HybridApp
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Standalone
  • iOS: HybridApp
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6654539_1730741572711.Recording__4466.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

@lanitochka17 lanitochka17 added the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Nov 4, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @francoisl (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 4, 2024

💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@lanitochka17
Copy link
Author

Production:

Recording.4469.mp4

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor

Discussing in this thread – https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1730740310124569, we're nearing a solution

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

We're just waiting on the Auth deploy now.

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

Auth deployed, removing the label.

@Julesssss Julesssss removed the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Nov 5, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Weekly KSv2 label Nov 28, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 28, 2024

This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. @francoisl eroding to Monthly issue.

P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Monthly KSv2 label Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Engineering Monthly KSv2 Reviewing Has a PR in review
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants