Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update ProfilePage #42188

Conversation

kosmydel
Copy link
Contributor

@kosmydel kosmydel commented May 15, 2024

Details

This PR refactors the DetailsPage component to use the new design described in the design doc.

This PR base is another PR, so to see changes only from this PR you can use this link.

Fixed Issues

$ #42077
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  1. Verify each Profile page if it works:
    1. Verify the new design is displayed, and match the Figma design.
    2. Verify the "Pin" button is displayed and works as expected.
    3. Verify the "Message" button is displayed and works as expected.
  2. Verify group messages:
    1. Create a new group chat with a few members.
    2. Send a message, and click an avatar to open the details page (your profile). Verify it works.
    3. Open the group chat details (click header bar), go to Members. Select a member, click "Profile", and verify it works.
  3. Verify DM:
    1. Open a DM with a user, click the avatar/header bar to open the details page. Verify it works.
  4. Verify public rooms:
    1. Go to public chat (e.g. #exfy-roadmap: /r/868417741568295)
    2. Click on the profile avatar, and verify it works.
  5. Open public profile:
    1. Go to https://dev.new.expensify.com:8082/a/1

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  • Verify tests from the Tests section.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android & iOS: Native
native.mov
Android & iOS: mWeb
mweb.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 11 43 45
Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 11 43 57
Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 11 44 12
Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 11 45 04

MacOS: Desktop

Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 11 46 36
Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 11 46 47

@kosmydel kosmydel force-pushed the @kosmydel/details-revamp/profile-page branch from 6c55eb2 to 6cb2ef2 Compare May 16, 2024 05:54
Copy link
Contributor

@cdOut cdOut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@kosmydel kosmydel marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2024 10:24
@kosmydel kosmydel requested review from a team as code owners May 20, 2024 10:24
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from akinwale and removed request for a team May 20, 2024 10:24
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 20, 2024

@akinwale Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@kosmydel kosmydel mentioned this pull request May 20, 2024
49 tasks
@grgia grgia self-requested a review May 20, 2024 11:45
@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

For this case here:
CleanShot 2024-05-20 at 10 01 36@2x

I feel like we should give the buttons a max-width of 50%. This way if there is just one button, it doesn't look quite as akward as this where it takes up the full width. Thoughts @Expensify/design ?

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

I feel like we should give the buttons a max-width of 50%. This way if there is just one button, it doesn't look quite as akward as this where it takes up the full width.

Yeah I can get down with that! It does look a bit massive when it's full-width haha.

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

I feel like we should give the buttons a max-width of 50%. This way if there is just one button, it doesn't look quite as akward as this where it takes up the full width.

Yeah that's clever and also making sure that it's centered which I'm sure it would be anyways :)

@kosmydel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! I will update it in the #41972 PR, as this is where we've introduced the PromotedActionBar.

@kosmydel kosmydel mentioned this pull request May 21, 2024
50 tasks
@kosmydel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done!
Screenshot 2024-05-21 at 10 28 46

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

And then for posterity, can you show us what it looks like when there are 2 or more buttons here? Just to make sure we got the styles correct. Thanks!

@kosmydel
Copy link
Contributor Author

And then for posterity, can you show us what it looks like when there are 2 or more buttons here? Just to make sure we got the styles correct. Thanks!

I will follow up in the original PR #41972 so as not to duplicate the discussion :D

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

@kosmydel Is this PR ready for C+ review?

@kosmydel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@akinwale Yes, this one is ready for initial review. Keep in mind, that this one is based on another PR which is still waiting for the merge. The changes from this particular PR are available here.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

here

@akinwale how are you getting on with the review? This PR has now merged: #41972

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify I started testing. I should be able to complete the checklist today.

@kosmydel There's a new merge conflict. Please check.

@kosmydel
Copy link
Contributor Author

kosmydel commented Jun 3, 2024

@kosmydel There's a new merge conflict. Please check.

I've resolved the conflicts ✅

Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code changes LGTM, going to make a test build for design review

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Jun 3, 2024

building...

@Expensify Expensify deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jun 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2024

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

akinwale commented Jun 4, 2024

@kosmydel The Pin button on the profile page doesn't show up until after you have opened a DM with a user. Just confirming that this is the expected behaviour. Thanks.

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

akinwale commented Jun 4, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

42188-android-native

Android: mWeb Chrome

42188-android-chrome

iOS: Native

42188-ios-native

iOS: mWeb Safari

42188-ios-safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari
42188-web.mp4
MacOS: Desktop

42188-desktop

Copy link
Contributor

@akinwale akinwale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from grgia June 4, 2024 03:16
@kosmydel
Copy link
Contributor Author

kosmydel commented Jun 4, 2024

@kosmydel The Pin button on the profile page doesn't show up until after you have opened a DM with a user. Just confirming that this is the expected behaviour. Thanks.

I think it is expected, as the report doesn't exist/is not loaded until we open a DM. cc @grgia for confirmation

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Jun 4, 2024

The Pin button on the profile page doesn't show up until after you have opened a DM with a user. Just confirming that this is the expected behaviour. Thanks.

@kosmydel @akinwale
yep, this is expected!

@grgia grgia merged commit bc3009a into Expensify:main Jun 4, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 4, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 6, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.4.79-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Comment on lines 52 to +58
return null;
}

if (promotedActions.length === 0) {
return null;
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kosmydel Any specific reason why the additional identical early return is needed here ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, it must have been added by mistake.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants