Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate ComposerWithSuggestions to useOnyx #51573

Merged

Conversation

blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

@blazejkustra blazejkustra commented Oct 28, 2024

Details

Initial focus for this PR was to fix performance tests, particularly one case '[ReportActionCompose] press add attachment button'. However during this week another PR was merged in #51461, which removed the above test.

Fixed Issues

$ #51562
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Testing Emoji Suggestions:

  1. Open the chat interface.
  2. Type an emoji trigger, starting with :sm followed by at least two more characters (e.g., :smile).
  3. Verify that the suggestion box appears adjacent to the composer

Testing Mention Suggestions:

  1. Open the chat interface.
  2. Initiate a mention by typing the @ symbol followed by any text (e.g., @username).
  3. Ensure the suggestion box pops up next to the composer
  • Test Composer overall, select emojis, try different styles (header, code, inline code etc), send message

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.webm
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-web.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-10-31.at.08.42.19.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@blazejkustra blazejkustra marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2024 08:35
@blazejkustra blazejkustra requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2024 08:35
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from rojiphil and removed request for a team October 31, 2024 08:35
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 31, 2024

@rojiphil Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

@blazejkustra Thanks for the PR. I will pick this up for review today

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 1, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Chrome / Safari
51573-web-safari-001.mp4
Android: Native
51573-android-native-001.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
51573-mweb-safari-001.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
51573-mweb-chrome-issue-001.mp4
iOS: Native
51573-ios-native-002.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
51573-desktop-001.mp4

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 1, 2024

@blazejkustra The PR tests well on all platforms except on mweb chrome where the app crashes.
However, I do not think this is related to the migration work done here, as this can also be reproduced in the latest main.
Can you please confirm this?

Here are the test videos and the test steps:

Note: This issue is observed in mweb chrome platform.

  1. Reload the app and navigate to a chat.
  2. Enter :sm so that the emoji dialog is displayed.
  3. Press Enter key
    Actual Result: The application crashes with message Cannot read properties of undefined
    Expected Result: The application should not crash.
This PR
51573-mweb-chrome-issue-002.mp4
Main-v9.0.56-2
9-0-56-2-main-issue.mp4

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 4, 2024

Note: This issue is observed in mweb chrome platform.

  1. Reload the app and navigate to a chat.
  2. Enter :sm so that the emoji dialog is displayed.
  3. Press Enter key
    Actual Result: The application crashes with message Cannot read properties of undefined
    Expected Result: The application should not crash.

As this bug can be reproduced even on the latest main .i.e. 9.0.56-7, I have reported this in the expensify-bugs slack channel here.

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor Author

My sources tell me it should be fixed with Expensify/react-native-live-markdown#531 😄

If it's unrelated to this PR, let's proceed with review @rojiphil

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 4, 2024

My sources tell me it should be fixed with Expensify/react-native-live-markdown#531 😄

If it's unrelated to this PR, let's proceed with review @rojiphil

Yeah. Let's proceed since it is fixed elsewhere. Apart from this issue, the code works well. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@rojiphil rojiphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lakchote Changes LGTM and works well too except for an issue mentioned here. But it is NAB for the migration work done here and is fixed elsewhere.
Over to you for review.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from lakchote November 4, 2024 12:16
Copy link
Contributor

@lakchote lakchote left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your work @blazejkustra, and thanks for your thorough review @rojiphil.

LGTM.

@lakchote lakchote merged commit ce60790 into Expensify:main Nov 4, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 4, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/lakchote in version: 9.0.57-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

const [modal] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.MODAL);
const [preferredSkinTone = CONST.EMOJI_DEFAULT_SKIN_TONE] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.PREFERRED_EMOJI_SKIN_TONE, {selector: EmojiUtils.getPreferredSkinToneIndex});
const [editFocused] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.INPUT_FOCUSED);
const [parentReportActions] = useOnyx(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${parentReportID}`, {canEvict: false, initWithStoredValues: false});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@blazejkustra I think we have a blocker issue here if parentReportID is undefined in which case the app will crash. We can reproduce this if we search for a chat with a user for whom there is no report present locally. Here is a screenshot of the crash.

Screenshot 2024-11-04 at 10 26 55 PM

@lakchote Not sure if we can have a fix soon for this. Otherwise we will have to revert the PR as this will be a blocker. Sorry for the inconvenience caused.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.0.57-10 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 skipped 🚫
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 skipped 🚫

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants