You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 21, 2022. It is now read-only.
There is a general agreement that these interpolation points are better suited for high-order elements. It seems like this should be a direct modification of the Lagrange class (for someone who's familiar with FIAT.....).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original comment by David Ham (Bitbucket: David_Ham, ).
This is a fair point. However you probably don't want to use FIAT for multiway tensor product (maybe except at the very lowest polynomial degree) because the scaling of assembly using fully tabulated elements (i.e. what FIAT does) is absolutely awful. The solution to this is to use FInAT, which avoids the naïve tabulation and facilitates the form compiler generating the optimal sum factored assembly algorithm.
Original report by Ben Crestel (Bitbucket: bcrestel, GitHub: bcrestel).
There is a general agreement that these interpolation points are better suited for high-order elements. It seems like this should be a direct modification of the Lagrange class (for someone who's familiar with FIAT.....).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: