[FH-2] NFT Store (#153) #182
Conversation
- add biome on package.json - add axios lib - add @reservoir0x/reservoir-sdk
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the NFT marketplace template, including new components, handlers, and utilities for managing NFTs. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 23
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
templates/nft/handlers/index.ts (1)
6-11: Consider standardizing the order of exported functions.For improved consistency and readability, consider aligning the order of the exported functions with the order of the imports. This minor change can make the code slightly more intuitive to navigate.
Here's a suggested reordering:
export default { initial, buy, sell, success, }templates/nft/views/Cover.tsx (2)
4-6: Component structure looks good, consider adding prop types or default values.The
CoverViewcomponent is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives by utilizing theconfigobject to display NFT-related information. The use of destructuring to pass props toBasicViewis efficient.To improve robustness, consider adding prop types or default values for the
configproperties. This can help prevent runtime errors if theconfigobject is incomplete.Here's a suggestion to add prop types and default values:
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; const CoverView = ({ title = '', description = '', coverImage = '' }: Config) => ( <BasicView title={title} subtitle={description} background={coverImage} /> ); CoverView.propTypes = { title: PropTypes.string, description: PropTypes.string, coverImage: PropTypes.string, };This change would provide better type safety and default values for the component props.
1-8: Overall implementation meets requirements, consider adding documentation.The
CoverViewcomponent successfully implements the basic structure for displaying NFT-related information as outlined in the PR objectives. It effectively utilizes theBasicViewcomponent and theConfigtype to achieve this.To further improve the implementation, consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to describe the component's purpose and expected props.
- Implementing error handling for cases where the
configobject might be incomplete or invalid.- Adding unit tests to ensure the component renders correctly with various prop combinations.
These additions would enhance the maintainability and robustness of the component.
Here's an example of how you could add JSDoc comments:
/** * CoverView Component * * Renders a cover view for an NFT marketplace using the BasicView component. * * @param {Config} config - Configuration object containing title, description, and coverImage. * @returns {JSX.Element} Rendered CoverView component */ const CoverView = (config: Config) => ( <BasicView title={config.title} subtitle={config.description} background={config.coverImage} /> )templates/nft/views/buy.tsx (1)
1-12: Overall assessment: Good start, but needs some enhancements.The
BuyViewcomponent aligns well with the PR objectives for creating an NFT marketplace template. It provides a basic view for buying an NFT, which is a crucial feature. However, to fully meet the objectives and enhance user experience, consider implementing the following improvements:
- Add error handling and fallback options for missing data.
- Implement proper price formatting and potential Wei to ETH conversion.
- Destructure component parameters for better clarity and type safety.
Additionally, to fully address the PR objectives:
- Implement gating options to restrict access to purchasing NFTs.
- Add functionality to verify orders on marketplaces.
- Include options for payment token selection.
These enhancements will make the component more robust and align it more closely with the comprehensive NFT marketplace features outlined in the PR objectives.
templates/nft/views/sell.tsx (1)
1-12: Overall implementation aligns with PR objectives, but consider additional featuresThe
SellViewcomponent is a good start for the NFT marketplace template, aligning with the PR objectives. However, to fully meet the objectives outlined in issue #153, consider the following additions:
- Implement gating options to restrict access to purchasing products.
- Add functionality to verify orders on marketplaces for NFTs.
- Include navigation features for displaying NFTs and facilitating transactions.
- Implement error handling and loading states.
- Consider adding more customization options as mentioned in the Inspector requirements.
These additions would make the component more robust and closer to a complete NFT marketplace solution.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these additional features?
templates/nft/views/success.tsx (1)
4-10: LGTM: Well-structured component with room for minor improvement.The
SuccessViewcomponent is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. It provides a clean success view for the NFT marketplace. The use of default values ensures robustness.Consider using optional chaining or nullish coalescing for a more concise syntax:
const SuccessView = (config: Config) => ( <BasicView - title={config.successTitle || 'Transaction Successful!'} - subtitle={config.successSubtitle || 'Thank you for using our marketplace.'} - background={config.successBackground || config.coverImage} + title={config.successTitle ?? 'Transaction Successful!'} + subtitle={config.successSubtitle ?? 'Thank you for using our marketplace.'} + background={config.successBackground ?? config.coverImage} /> )This change would make the code more idiomatic and handle cases where
config.successTitleorconfig.successSubtitlemight be an empty string.templates/nft/handlers/success.ts (1)
16-21: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Function body is concise and appropriate.The
successfunction body is well-structured and returns the expectedBuildFrameDataobject. The inclusion of a 'Back to Marketplace' button with a 'post' action is appropriate for the user flow after a successful transaction.However, I noticed that the
bodyandstorageparameters are currently unused in the function. If these are intended for future use, consider adding a TODO comment. If they're not needed, you might want to remove them from the function signature to keep the code clean.Consider updating the function signature if
bodyandstorageare not needed:export default async function success({ config, }: { config: Config }): Promise<BuildFrameData> { // ... rest of the function body }templates/nft/handlers/initial.ts (1)
1-22: Great start on the NFT marketplace template!This implementation provides a solid foundation for the NFT marketplace feature. It aligns well with the PR objectives and follows good TypeScript practices. Here are some suggestions for future enhancements:
- Consider adding error handling for cases where
configorstoragemight be incomplete.- Implement input validation for the
configobject to ensure all required fields are present.- Add comments explaining the purpose of each property in the returned object for better maintainability.
- Consider implementing a mechanism to dynamically generate buttons based on user permissions or NFT availability.
Overall, this is a good initial implementation that sets the stage for further development of the NFT marketplace feature.
templates/nft/views/Page.tsx (2)
20-20: Add a comment explaining the text fallback mechanism.The current implementation uses a logical OR to determine the displayed text. While concise, it may not be immediately clear to other developers how the fallback works. Consider adding a comment explaining this logic and the source of the default text.
Additionally, you might want to use a more explicit default value:
const displayText = config.text ?? template.initialConfig.text ?? "Welcome to NFT Marketplace";This approach provides a clear fallback chain and ensures there's always a readable message, even if both config sources fail.
1-23: Implementation is incomplete based on PR objectives.While this
CoverViewcomponent provides a good starting point, it doesn't yet implement many of the features outlined in the PR objectives. Consider the following next steps:
- Implement NFT display functionality, possibly as a separate component.
- Add purchase functionality, integrating with the Reservoir API as mentioned in the objectives.
- Implement gating options to restrict access to purchasing.
- Create sections for displaying NFTs and purchase history.
- Integrate with the Inspector for configuration of NFT details, cover images, and gating.
These additions will bring the implementation closer to the comprehensive NFT marketplace template described in the PR objectives.
Would you like assistance in planning the implementation of these features or creating skeleton code for any of these components?
templates/nft/types.ts (2)
4-10: LGTM: NFT interface is well-defined.The
NFTinterface correctly captures the essential properties of an NFT. All properties are appropriately typed as strings.Consider adding an optional
traitsproperty of typeRecord<string, string>to allow for custom attributes that some NFTs might have. This would enhance the flexibility of the interface:export interface NFT { // ... existing properties traits?: Record<string, string> }
20-27: LGTM: Storage interface effectively captures purchase information.The
Storageinterface extendsBaseStorageand includes apurchasesarray that comprehensively tracks NFT purchase details. This aligns well with the PR objectives for managing NFT transactions.Consider adding a unique identifier for each purchase, such as a
transactionHashorpurchaseId. This could be useful for future features like purchase lookup or cancellation:export interface Storage extends BaseStorage { purchases: { purchaseId: string // New field buyer: string nft: NFT price: string timestamp: number }[] }templates/index.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM! The NFT module has been successfully integrated.The changes appropriately add the NFT module to the templates, aligning with the PR objectives for introducing an NFT marketplace template. The implementation follows the existing pattern in the file, maintaining consistency.
For better code consistency, consider sorting the imports and exports alphabetically. This would make it easier to locate specific modules in the future. Here's a suggested change for the export object:
export default { beehiiv, cal, contract, discourse, figma, form, fundraiser, gated, gif, luma, medium, meme, + nft, pdf, poll, presentation, quizlet, rss, substack, swap, twitter, - nft, }Also applies to: 44-45
templates/nft/views/nft.tsx (2)
5-7: Component declaration looks good, consider adding prop validation.The component is well-defined using React.FC with TypeScript props. However, to improve robustness, consider adding prop validation and default props.
You could use PropTypes or TypeScript's built-in features for runtime checks. Here's an example using TypeScript:
import { FC } from 'react' interface NFTViewProps { nfts: NFT[] currentIndex: number } const NFTView: FC<NFTViewProps> = ({ nfts, currentIndex }) => { if (nfts.length === 0) { return <div>No NFTs available</div> } if (currentIndex < 0 || currentIndex >= nfts.length) { return <div>Invalid NFT index</div> } // ... rest of the component }
1-30: Good start on NFT view, but more features needed to meet PR objectives.The NFTView component provides a good foundation for displaying NFTs and basic navigation. However, to fully meet the PR objectives, consider implementing the following:
- Integrate with the Reservoir API for fetching order statuses and managing transaction data.
- Implement gating options to restrict access to purchasing NFTs.
- Add purchase functionality, including payment token selection and transaction confirmation.
- Implement visibility controls based on viewer's ownership status.
- Add sections for success messages and gating configurations.
To achieve these objectives, you might need to:
- Create additional components for purchase flow and gating.
- Implement hooks or services for API integration.
- Extend the NFTView component to include more detailed NFT information and purchase options.
Would you like assistance in planning the implementation of these features?
templates/nft/index.ts (1)
12-44: LGTM: Well-structured template object with minor improvement suggestions.The main export object is well-structured and provides a comprehensive template for an NFT Marketplace. Here are some suggestions for minor improvements:
Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose of key properties, especially for the gating structure.
The
nftsarray ininitialConfigis empty. It might be helpful to provide a sample NFT object to guide users.The
eventsarray is empty. If there are plans to add events later, consider adding a TODO comment.Here's an example of how you could add JSDoc comments and a sample NFT:
export default { // ... other properties initialConfig: { // ... other properties /** * Array of NFTs available in the marketplace. * Each NFT object should include properties like contractAddress, tokenId, etc. */ nfts: [ { contractAddress: '0x...', tokenId: '1', name: 'Sample NFT', description: 'This is a sample NFT', image: 'https://example.com/sample-nft.jpg', }, ], /** * Gating configuration to control access to the marketplace. */ gating: { // ... gating properties }, }, /** * Array of custom events for the marketplace. * TODO: Implement custom events for the NFT marketplace. */ events: [], } satisfies BaseTemplatetemplates/nft/page.tsx (3)
7-9: Consider consistent hook usage pattern.The component declaration and hook usage are generally correct. However, for consistency, consider destructuring the
useFrameStoragehook result similar touseFrameConfig.You could update line 9 as follows:
-const storage = useFrameStorage<Storage>() +const [storage] = useFrameStorage<Storage>()This change assumes that
useFrameStoragereturns an array similar touseFrameConfig. If it doesn't, please disregard this suggestion.
42-42: LGTM: Component export is correct.The default export of the component is appropriate. For consistency with the file name, you might consider renaming the component to match:
-const Page: React.FC = () => { +const NFTPage: React.FC = () => { // ... } -export default Page +export default NFTPageThis change would align the component name with the file name (
page.tsx), improving clarity and maintainability.
1-42: Implementation progress: Basic structure in place, key features missingThe current implementation provides a good starting point for the NFT marketplace template, aligning with some of the PR objectives. However, several key features mentioned in the objectives are not yet implemented:
- Gating options to restrict access to purchasing products
- Verification of orders on marketplaces
- Payment token selection and transaction confirmation
- Utilization of the Reservoir API for fetching order statuses and managing transaction data
To fully meet the PR objectives, consider implementing these missing features in subsequent iterations. Additionally, ensure that the Inspector sections (general settings, NFT details, cover images, success messages, and gating configurations) are properly integrated with this component.
To proceed with the implementation:
- Implement access control logic using the gating options.
- Integrate the Reservoir API for order status and transaction management.
- Add UI elements for payment token selection and transaction confirmation.
- Implement order verification functionality.
- Ensure that the Inspector configurations are properly reflected in this component's behavior and rendering.
Would you like assistance in planning the implementation of these features?
package.json (1)
9-11: Approve changes to scripts and suggest minor improvementThe addition of
biomefor linting, formatting, and checking is a good improvement for code quality and standardization. However, consider combining thelint,format, andcheckscripts into a singlevalidatescript for convenience.Consider adding a
validatescript that runs all checks:"validate": "biome lint . && biome format . && biome check --apply ."templates/nft/utils/reservoir.ts (1)
16-20: Validate Ethereum AddressesEnsure that
contractAddress,tokenId,takerAddress, andmakerAddressare valid before making API requests. Invalid inputs could lead to API errors or unexpected behavior.Consider adding validation checks using a library like
ethers.js:import { utils } from 'ethers' function isValidAddress(address: string): boolean { return utils.isAddress(address) }Also applies to: 30-34
templates/nft/Inspector.tsx (2)
55-242: Consider adding validation for user inputsCurrently, the input fields for NFT details and marketplace settings don't have validation. Users might enter incorrect or invalid data, leading to potential issues down the line.
Implement validation for fields such as:
- Ensuring the
contractAddressis a valid Ethereum address.- Checking that
tokenIdis a positive integer.- Verifying that required fields are not empty before allowing submission.
This enhances the robustness of the application and improves user experience by providing immediate feedback.
10-13: Remove unused hooks if not necessaryThe hooks
useFarcasterIdanduseResetPrevieware imported but not used within theInspectorcomponent.If these hooks are not needed, consider removing them to keep the code clean.
-import { useFarcasterId, useFrameConfig, useResetPreview, useUploadImage } from '@/sdk/hooks' +import { useFrameConfig, useUploadImage } from '@/sdk/hooks'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
templates/nft/cover.jpegis excluded by!**/*.jpeg
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- templates/index.ts (2 hunks)
- templates/nft/Inspector.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/handlers/buy.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/handlers/index.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/handlers/initial.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/handlers/page.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/handlers/sell.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/handlers/success.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/index.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/types.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/utils/reservoir.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/views/Cover.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/views/Page.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/views/buy.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/views/nft.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/views/sell.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/views/success.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (34)
templates/nft/handlers/index.ts (2)
1-11: LGTM! Well-structured module for NFT handlers.The implementation effectively aggregates and exports the NFT-related handler functions. This approach promotes modularity and makes it easier to manage and use these handlers throughout the application.
1-4: Verify implementation of PR objectives in handler files.The PR objectives mention several key features such as utilizing the Reservoir API, implementing gating options, and developing a Page.tsx component. While this file provides a good structure for organizing the handlers, we should verify that the imported handler files (
buy.ts,initial.ts,sell.ts, andsuccess.ts) implement these features as per the objectives.To verify the implementation of PR objectives, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Update and rerun verification scripts with correct file type identifiers.
To address the errors encountered in the previous shell scripts, the file type identifier has been corrected from
typescripttots. Please run the updated scripts below to verify the implementation of the PR objectives in the handler files.
PR objectives are implemented correctly in handler files.
- Reservoir API usage is present in
buy.tsandsell.ts.- Gating options are implemented in
buy.tsandsell.tsthroughrunGatingChecks.- Page.tsx component exists in
templates/nft/views/Page.tsx.- NFT-related functionality is implemented across
buy.ts,sell.ts, andinitial.ts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of PR objectives in handler files # Test 1: Check for Reservoir API usage echo "Checking for Reservoir API usage:" rg --type typescript 'reservoir' templates/nft/handlers # Test 2: Check for gating options implementation echo "Checking for gating options implementation:" rg --type typescript 'gat(e|ing)' templates/nft/handlers # Test 3: Check for Page.tsx component echo "Checking for Page.tsx component:" fd --type file --extension tsx 'Page' templates/nft # Test 4: Check for NFT-related functionality echo "Checking for NFT-related functionality:" rg --type typescript 'NFT|token|contract' templates/nft/handlersLength of output: 705
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of PR objectives in handler files # Test 1: Check for Reservoir API usage echo "Checking for Reservoir API usage:" rg --type ts 'reservoir' templates/nft/handlers # Test 2: Check for gating options implementation echo "Checking for gating options implementation:" rg --type ts 'gat(e|ing)' templates/nft/handlers # Test 3: Check for Page.tsx component echo "Checking for Page.tsx component:" fd --type file --extension tsx 'Page' templates/nft # Test 4: Check for NFT-related functionality echo "Checking for NFT-related functionality:" rg --type ts 'NFT|token|contract' templates/nft/handlersLength of output: 1599
templates/nft/views/Cover.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and well-structured.The import statements are concise and relevant to the component's requirements. The use of absolute import for the
BasicViewcomponent and relative import for theConfigtype is consistent with best practices.
8-8: LGTM: Appropriate use of default export.The default export of the
CoverViewcomponent is correct and follows best practices for a single-component file. This allows for easy import and potential renaming in other parts of the application.templates/nft/views/buy.tsx (2)
12-12: LGTM! Export statement is correct.The default export of the
BuyViewcomponent is appropriate for this file.
1-2: LGTM! Verify the@/alias configuration.The imports look good and are appropriately organized. The use of relative import for types is a good practice.
Please run the following script to verify the
@/alias configuration:Ensure that the
@/alias is properly configured in your project's TypeScript or JavaScript configuration file.templates/nft/views/sell.tsx (2)
12-12: LGTM: Default export is appropriateThe default export of the
SellViewcomponent is correct and follows best practices for a single component file.
1-2: Verify import alias configurationThe import statement for
BasicViewuses the@/alias. While this is a common convention, please ensure that this alias is properly configured in your project's TypeScript or build configuration.Run the following script to check for the alias configuration:
templates/nft/views/success.tsx (3)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are concise and relevant to the component's requirements. The use of relative import for types and absolute import for the SDK component follows good practices.
12-12: LGTM: Appropriate export statement.The default export of the
SuccessViewcomponent is correct and follows common React component export patterns.
1-12: Summary: SuccessView component aligns well with PR objectives.The
SuccessViewcomponent introduced in this file is a well-implemented addition to the NFT marketplace feature. It provides a customizable success view, which is an essential part of the user experience after completing a transaction. The component's flexibility, achieved through the use of theConfigobject, allows for easy customization of the success message and background.This implementation directly contributes to the PR objectives by enhancing the NFT marketplace template. It provides a clean and professional way to confirm successful transactions to users, which is crucial for a positive user experience in an NFT marketplace.
The code is concise, well-structured, and integrates smoothly with the existing SDK and type system. With the minor syntax improvement suggested earlier, this component will be an excellent addition to the NFT marketplace template.
templates/nft/handlers/success.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The import statements are correctly implemented, importing necessary types and components. The use of both relative and absolute imports is consistent with TypeScript best practices.
7-15: LGTM: Function signature is well-defined and typed.The
successfunction signature is correctly implemented as an asynchronous function. It properly uses TypeScript type annotations for its parameters and return type, which enhances code clarity and type safety.
1-21: Great implementation: Aligns well with PR objectives.This
success.tsfile effectively implements a success handler for the NFT marketplace template, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code is clean, concise, and follows TypeScript best practices. It properly handles the success state of an NFT transaction and provides a user-friendly way to return to the marketplace.The implementation contributes to the overall goal of enabling users to create their own NFT marketplaces within the FrameTrain platform. It handles the post-transaction flow, which is a crucial part of the user experience in an NFT marketplace.
Good job on keeping the code focused and maintainable!
templates/nft/handlers/initial.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and server directive are correctly implemented.The 'use server' directive and imports are appropriately set up for server-side functionality and type safety.
6-22: LGTM: Function implementation aligns with PR objectives.The
initialfunction is well-structured and type-safe. It correctly sets up the frame data for the NFT marketplace, including buy and sell options. The use ofconfigfor customization is good practice.However, please verify if 'buy' is the intended default handler. Consider if 'sell' should also be an option or if a more neutral default like 'select' would be more appropriate.
To ensure consistency with the handler implementation, please run the following script:
templates/nft/handlers/page.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and aligned with the function's requirements.The imported types and component are relevant to the function's implementation, providing necessary type definitions and the view component.
16-25: Address unused parameters and consider potential improvements.The function body appears to be correctly structured, but there are some observations and suggestions:
The 'body', 'storage', and 'params' parameters are not used in the function body. This might indicate missed functionality or unnecessary parameters.
The single button with a '←' label suggests a back or return functionality. Ensure this aligns with the intended user experience.
The 'initial' handler value might be a default state, but its purpose is not clear without more context. Consider adding a comment explaining its significance.
The function doesn't seem to handle any NFT-specific logic. Given the PR objectives, you might want to include some NFT-related functionality here.
To ensure we're not missing any NFT-related functionality, let's check for other handlers or components that might be using this page function:
Would you like assistance in implementing NFT-specific logic or utilizing the unused parameters?
✅ Verification successful
Confirm unused parameters in function.
The search indicates that the
pagefunction is not used or extended elsewhere in the codebase. Therefore, thebody,storage, andparamsparameters are indeed unused in this context.Consider removing these parameters to simplify the function and improve code clarity.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other files that might be using or extending this page function rg --type typescript -g '!templates/nft/handlers/page.ts' -i 'page.*handler|nft.*store'Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other files that might be using or extending this page function rg --type ts -g '!templates/nft/handlers/page.ts' -i 'page.*handler|nft.*store'Length of output: 81
templates/nft/views/Page.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are concise and relevant to the component's requirements. The use of a type import for
Configis a good TypeScript practice, ensuring type safety without importing unnecessary runtime code.
4-4: LGTM: Component declaration follows best practices.The
CoverViewcomponent is well-defined as a functional component with proper TypeScript typing for its prop. The export style and naming convention align with React best practices.templates/nft/types.ts (4)
1-2: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.The import statements are correctly importing the necessary types for the interfaces defined in this file. The use of path aliases (
@/) is a good practice for maintaining clean and readable import statements.
12-18: LGTM: Config interface is comprehensive and aligns with PR objectives.The
Configinterface extendsBaseConfigand includes all necessary properties for configuring an NFT marketplace as outlined in the PR objectives. The inclusion of thegatingproperty of typeGatingTypeaddresses the requirement for implementing access restrictions.
29-31:⚠️ Potential issueTODO: Define ReservoirOrderResponse interface fields.
The
ReservoirOrderResponseinterface is currently empty. As the PR objectives mention utilizing the Reservoir API for fetching order statuses and managing transaction data, it's crucial to define this interface properly.Please take the following actions:
- Replace the Portuguese comment with an English one for consistency.
- Define the fields for the Reservoir API response based on their documentation.
- If the exact fields are not yet known, add a TODO comment in English explaining what needs to be done.
Example:
export interface ReservoirOrderResponse { // TODO: Define fields based on Reservoir API documentation // Expected fields: orderId, status, price, etc. }To ensure we're using the correct fields, let's check the Reservoir API documentation:
1-31: Overall, the types.ts file provides a solid foundation for the NFT marketplace feature.The interfaces defined in this file align well with the PR objectives and provide a clear structure for the NFT marketplace template. The
NFT,Config, andStorageinterfaces are well-designed and cover the necessary aspects of the feature.However, there are a few areas for improvement:
- Consider adding a
traitsproperty to theNFTinterface for additional flexibility.- Add a unique identifier to the purchase entries in the
Storageinterface.- The
ReservoirOrderResponseinterface needs to be properly defined based on the Reservoir API documentation.These improvements will enhance the robustness and future-proofing of the NFT marketplace template.
To ensure we haven't missed any important types or interfaces related to the NFT marketplace, let's check for any other type definitions in the project:
templates/nft/views/nft.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The import statements are concise and relevant to the component's requirements. Good practice in importing React only for type usage.
30-30: LGTM: Component export is correct.The default export of the NFTView component is appropriate and follows React best practices.
templates/nft/index.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are well-structured and appropriate.The imports are well-organized, importing necessary types, components, and assets. The use of type imports from a centralized types file is a good practice for maintaining type consistency across the project.
1-44: Overall implementation looks good, with some aspects to verify.The
index.tsfile provides a solid foundation for the NFT Marketplace template, aligning well with the PR objectives. It sets up the necessary structure for users to create their own NFT marketplaces within the FrameTrain platform.However, some specific functionalities mentioned in the PR objectives are not directly visible in this file:
- Utilization of the Reservoir API for fetching order statuses and managing transaction data.
- Implementation of the
Page.tsxcomponent for displaying NFTs and purchases.- Structuring of the Inspector with sections for NFT details, cover images, etc.
- Features for creating individual sections for each NFT.
- Order verification and transaction handling.
These functionalities might be implemented in the imported
handlersor in other files not shown in this review.To ensure all objectives are met, please run the following script to check for the implementation of these features:
This script will help verify the implementation of key features mentioned in the PR objectives but not directly visible in the
index.tsfile.templates/nft/page.tsx (1)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and type declarations are appropriate.The imports are well-structured, utilizing custom SDK hooks and proper type imports. The absence of an explicit React import is fine for newer versions of React.
package.json (3)
103-103: Approve addition of @biomejs/biomeThe addition of
@biomejs/biomeas a dev dependency is consistent with the new scripts for linting, formatting, and checking. This will help maintain code quality and consistency across the project.
1-118: Summary of package.json changesThe changes to
package.jsonalign well with the PR objectives for implementing the NFT marketplace functionality:
- The addition of
@reservoir0x/reservoir-sdksupports interaction with the Reservoir API for NFT trading.- The update to
@paywithglide/glide-jsand addition ofaxiosimprove the project's capabilities for API interactions.- The introduction of
biomefor linting, formatting, and checking enhances code quality and consistency.These changes provide a solid foundation for the NFT Store feature implementation.
31-31: Approve dependency changes and suggest security considerationThe updates and additions to the dependencies align well with the PR objectives, particularly the addition of
@reservoir0x/reservoir-sdkfor NFT marketplace functionality. The update to@paywithglide/glide-jsis also good for keeping the project up-to-date.For security reasons, it's important to verify that these new dependencies don't introduce any vulnerabilities. Please run a security audit:
Also applies to: 56-56, 62-62
templates/nft/handlers/buy.ts (2)
29-39: Verify the correctness of button actions and handlerAll buttons except 'Cancel' have
action: 'tx', which might not clearly differentiate the actions for each button. Ensure that the backend logic distinguishes between 'Confirm Purchase', 'Buy with ETH', and 'Buy with USDC'. Additionally, thehandleris set to'success', which may imply that the transaction is complete. Confirm that this aligns with the intended flow, especially if the purchase hasn't been finalized yet.
18-18: Ensure comprehensive gating checksThe
runGatingChecksfunction is called to enforce gating based onconfig.gating. Verify that this function adequately checks all necessary conditions and properly handles scenarios where gating requirements aren't met, providing appropriate feedback to the user.
| export default async function page({ | ||
| body, | ||
| config, | ||
| storage, | ||
| params, | ||
| }: { | ||
| body: FramePayloadValidated | ||
| config: Config | ||
| storage: Storage | ||
| params: any | ||
| }): Promise<BuildFrameData> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing function signature for clarity and type safety.
While the function signature is generally well-structured, there are a few points to consider:
-
The function name 'page' is quite generic. Consider a more descriptive name that reflects its role in the NFT store context, such as 'handleNFTStorePage' or 'buildNFTStoreFrameData'.
-
The 'params' parameter is typed as 'any', which may lead to type safety issues. If possible, define a more specific type for this parameter based on its expected content.
-
The 'storage' parameter is not used in the function body. If it's not needed, consider removing it to keep the function signature clean.
Here's a suggested refactoring of the function signature:
export default async function buildNFTStoreFrameData({
body,
config,
params,
}: {
body: FramePayloadValidated
config: Config
params: NFTStoreParams // Define this type based on expected content
}): Promise<BuildFrameData> {
// Function body...
}Replace NFTStoreParams with a more specific type definition based on the expected structure of the params object.
| return ( | ||
| <div | ||
| style={{ | ||
| width: '100%', | ||
| height: '100%', | ||
| backgroundColor: 'black', | ||
| display: 'flex', | ||
| justifyContent: 'center', | ||
| alignItems: 'center', | ||
| textAlign: 'center', | ||
| fontFamily: 'Roboto', | ||
| fontSize: '50px', | ||
| color: '#ffffff', | ||
| }} | ||
| > |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using CSS modules or styled-components for better style management.
While the inline styles effectively create the desired layout, consider refactoring to use CSS modules or styled-components. This approach would improve maintainability, reusability, and separation of concerns. It would also allow for easier theming and responsive design adjustments.
Example using CSS modules:
import styles from './CoverView.module.css';
// In the component
<div className={styles.coverContainer}>
{/* content */}
</div>This change would make the component more maintainable and align better with scalable React practices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
templates/nft/views/buy.tsx (2)
5-11: Great implementation with room for a minor improvement.The component looks well-implemented, addressing previous review comments:
- Proper prop destructuring
- Fallback values for missing data
- Correct use of the
weiToEthutility function for price formattingOne suggestion:
Verify the fallback image path:
- background={nft.imageUrl || '/nft/fallback-image.jpg'} + background={nft.imageUrl || '/path/to/verified/fallback-image.jpg'}Ensure that the fallback image path is correct and the image exists in your project structure.
1-13: Well-implemented BuyView component with potential for future enhancements.The BuyView component provides a solid foundation for displaying NFT purchase information in the marketplace template. It addresses previous review comments and implements robust error handling and formatting.
To fully meet the PR objectives, consider these future enhancements:
- Implement gating options to restrict NFT purchases.
- Add functionality to verify orders on marketplaces.
- Incorporate payment token selection and transaction confirmation features.
These additions would further align the component with the comprehensive NFT marketplace template goals outlined in the PR objectives.
templates/nft/utils/reservoir.ts (2)
20-36: LGTM with a minor suggestion: buyTokens implementationThe
buyTokensfunction is well-implemented and includes proper error handling as suggested in a previous review. It aligns with the PR objectives for managing NFT transactions.For consistency with the
createListingfunction, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this function.Add a brief comment explaining the function's purpose:
+// Executes a buy order for the specified NFT export async function buyTokens( contractAddress: string, tokenId: string, takerAddress: string ): Promise<ReservoirOrderResponse> {
38-60: LGTM with a minor suggestion: createListing implementationThe
createListingfunction is well-implemented, including proper error handling and the parameterization ofweiPriceas suggested in previous reviews. It aligns with the PR objectives for creating NFT listings.For consistency with the suggested improvement for
buyTokens, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this function.Add a brief comment explaining the function's purpose:
+// Creates a new listing for the specified NFT export async function createListing( contractAddress: string, tokenId: string, makerAddress: string, weiPrice: string ): Promise<ReservoirOrderResponse> {templates/nft/Inspector.tsx (3)
189-189: Clarify placeholder textThe placeholder text "e.g., Uhulll.." may be unclear to users. Consider replacing it with a more commonly understood expression.
Suggested change:
- placeholder="e.g., Uhulll.." + placeholder="e.g., Success!"
197-197: Improve placeholder text for clarityThe placeholder "e.g., Success seller, success Buy" might be confusing. Consider rephrasing it to convey the intended message more clearly.
Suggested change:
- placeholder="e.g., Success seller, success Buy" + placeholder="e.g., Thank you for your purchase!"
59-70: Ensure consistent styling and placeholders for Input componentsIn the "General" section, the
Inputcomponents for "Marketplace Title" and "Marketplace Description" lackclassNameandplaceholderprops, unlike otherInputcomponents in the code. For consistency and better user experience, consider addingclassNamefor styling andplaceholdertext.Suggested change:
<Input name="title" label="Marketplace Title" value={config.title} onChange={(e) => updateConfig({ title: e.target.value })} + placeholder="e.g., My NFT Marketplace" + className="w-full p-2 border rounded mb-2" /> <Input name="description" label="Marketplace Description" value={config.description} onChange={(e) => updateConfig({ description: e.target.value })} + placeholder="e.g., A place to trade unique NFTs" + className="w-full p-2 border rounded mb-2" />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- templates/nft/Inspector.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/utils/formatters.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/utils/reservoir.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/views/buy.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/nft/views/sell.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- templates/nft/views/sell.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
templates/nft/views/buy.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are well-structured and appropriate.The imports are concise and relevant to the component's requirements. Good use of type imports and utility function import for code reusability.
13-13: LGTM: Proper export of the component.The default export of the BuyView component is correct and follows standard practices for React components.
templates/nft/utils/reservoir.ts (3)
1-18: LGTM: Imports and API setup look goodThe 'use server' directive, imports, and API key setup are well-implemented. The check for RESERVOIR_API_KEY addresses a previous review comment, improving error handling.
13-18: LGTM: Axios client setup is correctThe axios client is properly configured with the base URL and API key in the headers. This setup aligns with the PR objective of utilizing the Reservoir API efficiently.
1-60: Great implementation of Reservoir API integrationThis file successfully implements the required functionality for the NFT marketplace template, aligning well with the PR objectives. The
buyTokensandcreateListingfunctions provide the necessary interactions with the Reservoir API for managing NFT transactions and listings.Key points:
- Proper error handling has been implemented as suggested in previous reviews.
- The
weiPriceparameter increateListinghas been added, improving flexibility.- The code is well-structured and follows best practices for API interactions.
These implementations contribute significantly to the goal of enabling users to create their own NFT marketplaces within the FrameTrain platform.
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| export const weiToEth = (wei: string) => Number(wei) / 1e18 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider improving precision and adding input validation
The weiToEth function is a good start, but there are some potential issues to address:
- Precision loss: JavaScript's
Numbertype may not accurately represent very large wei values or very small Ether values. - Lack of input validation: The function doesn't check if the input is a valid number string.
- Potential issues with extremely large numbers: Very large wei values might result in scientific notation or Infinity when converted to Number.
To improve the function, consider the following suggestions:
- Use a big number library like
ethers.jsorbignumber.jsfor precise calculations. - Add input validation to ensure the input is a valid number string.
- Consider returning a string to preserve precision for very small Ether values.
Here's an example implementation using ethers.js:
import { ethers } from 'ethers';
export const weiToEth = (wei: string): string => {
if (!/^\d+$/.test(wei)) {
throw new Error('Invalid wei value: must be a string of digits');
}
return ethers.utils.formatEther(wei);
};This implementation provides better precision, input validation, and handles large numbers correctly.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of these improvements?
|
|
||
| <Configuration.Section name="NFTs" description="Add and manage NFTs"> | ||
| {config.nfts.map((nft, index) => ( | ||
| <div key={index} className="mb-6 p-4 border rounded "> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using array index as key; use a unique identifier instead
In the config.nfts.map(...) at line 105, using the index as the key can cause rendering issues when NFTs are added or removed. React recommends using a stable unique identifier for each item. Consider adding an id field to each NFT when it's created and using that as the key.
To implement this, modify the addNFT function to assign a unique id to each NFT:
+ import { v4 as uuidv4 } from 'uuid';
const addNFT = () => {
const newNFT: NFT = {
+ id: uuidv4(),
contractAddress: '',
tokenId: '',
name: '',
description: '',
imageUrl: '',
}
updateConfig({ nfts: [...config.nfts, newNFT] })
}Update the NFT type to include the id field, and then use nft.id as the key:
// In types.ts
export interface NFT {
+ id: string;
contractAddress: string;
tokenId: string;
name: string;
description: string;
imageUrl: string;
}
// In the mapping:
{config.nfts.map((nft) => (
- <div key={index} className="mb-6 p-4 border rounded ">
+ <div key={nft.id} className="mb-6 p-4 border rounded ">
// rest of the code
</div>
))}Also applies to: 16-25
| <div className="flex items-center space-x-2"> | ||
| <input | ||
| id="coverImage" | ||
| type="file" | ||
| accept="image/*" | ||
| className="hidden" | ||
| onChange={(e) => { | ||
| const file = e.target.files?.[0] | ||
| if (file) { | ||
| uploadImageFile(file, (filePath) => { | ||
| updateConfig({ coverImage: filePath }) | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Button | ||
| onClick={() => document.getElementById('coverImage')?.click()} | ||
| className="flex items-center space-x-2 px-4 py-2 bg-blue-500 text-white rounded hover:bg-blue-600" | ||
| > | ||
| <UploadIcon className="w-4 h-4" /> | ||
| <span>Upload Image</span> | ||
| </Button> | ||
| {config.coverImage && ( | ||
| <span className="text-sm text-gray-500">Image uploaded</span> | ||
| )} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated image upload code into a reusable component
The image upload functionality for the cover image, NFT images, and success background is implemented similarly in multiple places. Consider creating a reusable ImageUpload component to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
Example of how you might create an ImageUpload component:
// ImageUpload.tsx
import { Button, Label } from '@/sdk/components'
import { UploadIcon } from 'lucide-react'
interface ImageUploadProps {
label: string
onUpload: (filePath: string) => void
uploaded?: boolean
}
export function ImageUpload({ label, onUpload, uploaded }: ImageUploadProps) {
const inputId = `image-upload-${label.replace(/\s+/g, '-').toLowerCase()}`
return (
<div className="mb-2">
<Label htmlFor={inputId} className="block mb-2">
{label}
</Label>
<div className="flex items-center space-x-2">
<input
id={inputId}
type="file"
accept="image/*"
className="hidden"
onChange={(e) => {
const file = e.target.files?.[0]
if (file) {
uploadImageFile(file, onUpload)
}
}}
/>
<Button
onClick={() => document.getElementById(inputId)?.click()}
className="flex items-center space-x-2 px-4 py-2 bg-blue-500 text-white rounded hover:bg-blue-600"
>
<UploadIcon className="w-4 h-4" />
<span>Upload Image</span>
</Button>
{uploaded && (
<span className="text-sm text-gray-500">Image uploaded</span>
)}
</div>
</div>
)
}Then replace the repeated sections with this component, passing appropriate props.
Also applies to: 135-165, 200-230
| onChange={(e) => { | ||
| const file = e.target.files?.[0] | ||
| if (file) { | ||
| handleImageUpload(index, file) | ||
| } | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Undefined function handleImageUpload
The function handleImageUpload is called at line 148, but it is not defined in the code. This will result in a runtime error when trying to upload an NFT image.
Apply this diff to fix the issue by using uploadImageFile instead:
onChange={(e) => {
const file = e.target.files?.[0]
if (file) {
- handleImageUpload(index, file)
+ uploadImageFile(file, (filePath) => {
+ updateNFT(index, 'imageUrl', filePath)
+ })
}
}}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| {config.coverImage && ( | ||
| <span className="text-sm text-gray-500">Image uploaded</span> | ||
| )} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance user experience by showing a preview of the uploaded cover image
Currently, when a cover image is uploaded, a text message "Image uploaded" is shown. To improve user experience, consider displaying a thumbnail preview of the uploaded image so users can verify the correct image is selected.
Suggested change:
{config.coverImage && (
- <span className="text-sm text-gray-500">Image uploaded</span>
+ <img
+ src={config.coverImage}
+ alt="Cover Image Preview"
+ className="h-16 w-16 object-cover rounded"
+ />
)}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {config.coverImage && ( | |
| <span className="text-sm text-gray-500">Image uploaded</span> | |
| )} | |
| {config.coverImage && ( | |
| <img | |
| src={config.coverImage} | |
| alt="Cover Image Preview" | |
| className="h-16 w-16 object-cover rounded" | |
| /> | |
| )} |
General Feedback
ty and lfg! |
|
besides the feedback left in other PRs about views, usability, and all the rest which is valid for this template too, your |
add nft marketplace template feature
close #153
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
These updates enhance the user experience by providing a more robust NFT marketplace interface and improved transaction handling.