Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flux Optimizers should define equality #823

Open
oxinabox opened this issue Jul 29, 2019 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #1481
Open

Flux Optimizers should define equality #823

oxinabox opened this issue Jul 29, 2019 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #1481

Comments

@oxinabox
Copy link
Member

I was writing some tests, and I wanted to be sure that the hyper-parameters of two models were the same.
So I was checking equality on an object that contained all my hyperparameters,
including the optimizer (which has its own hyper-parameters).

Turns out that fails as

julia> Flux.Optimise.NADAM(0.003, (0.9, 0.9), IdDict{Any,Any}()) == Flux.Optimise.NADAM(0.003, (0.9, 0.9), IdDict{Any,Any}())
false
@DhairyaLGandhi
Copy link
Member

Should be much easier as we remove the states completely from the optimisers.

@MikeInnes
Copy link
Member

Yeah, this is not well defined right now but can happen as part of #637.

@ToucheSir
Copy link
Member

#637 has since been spun off as Optimisers.jl, which supports equality comparison OOTB :)

@darsnack darsnack linked a pull request Jun 14, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants