Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SVD_ImageCompression: Missing algorithm number #94

Open
kurteh opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

SVD_ImageCompression: Missing algorithm number #94

kurteh opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Easy Difficulty Level Typo Meaning is clear (to someone who's on the team), but there is a spelling/symbolic error Volume 1 Lab Category

Comments

@kurteh
Copy link

kurteh commented Nov 19, 2024

Typo Details:

Says "Use Algorithm to " instead of "Use Algorithm 1 to ".

Suggested Fix:

Add the 1.

Source Lines

Relevant segments in `/Volume1/SVD_ImageCompression/SVD_ImageCompression.md`:
- Approximate line: 149:
  - Section: Problem 1
- Approximate line: 149:
  - Section: Problem 1
- Approximate line: 149:
  - Section: Problem 1
- Approximate line: 149:
  - Section: Problem 1
@kurteh kurteh added the Typo Meaning is clear (to someone who's on the team), but there is a spelling/symbolic error label Nov 19, 2024
@iso2013 iso2013 added the Volume 1 Lab Category label Nov 19, 2024
@iso2013 iso2013 changed the title Typo: SVD_ImageCompression: <Descriptive title here> Typo: SVD_ImageCompression: Missing algorithm number Nov 19, 2024
@iso2013 iso2013 added the Easy Difficulty Level label Nov 19, 2024
@iso2013 iso2013 changed the title Typo: SVD_ImageCompression: Missing algorithm number SVD_ImageCompression: Missing algorithm number Nov 19, 2024
@iso2013 iso2013 self-assigned this Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Easy Difficulty Level Typo Meaning is clear (to someone who's on the team), but there is a spelling/symbolic error Volume 1 Lab Category
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants