-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] Xilinx Zynq and Ultrascale functional differences in 4.x #1172
Comments
Hello, thank you for your interest in FreeRTOS+TCP. How do you mean that the Ultrascale driver is not keeping pace with the Zynq driver? |
Hi @htibosch, Hello @JohnnyOpcode, Thank you in advance for your support and involvement! |
@ActoryOu I don't have the level of subject-matter expertise to code such a PR. I have my hands full with just the FreeRTOS robotic application (on MPSoC). |
Hi @ActoryOu , @JohnnyOpcode and @htibosch , I did a port for this a number of months ago, but I have been too busy to contribute it... Please find attached zip with source, if anyone has time to get it into the source tree please feel free! I hope that is helpful! Kind Regards, Pete |
Ah yes, now I understand it, Pete. |
I looked at the proposed new driver in detail. At the first sight it looks good. |
I'd like to migrate a MPSoC (Ultrascale) project to 4.x, but
https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Plus-TCP/blob/main/source/portable/NetworkInterface/xilinx_ultrascale/NetworkInterface.c
is not keeping pace with
https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Plus-TCP/blob/main/source/portable/NetworkInterface/Zynq/NetworkInterface.c
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: